next appl (games for windows live) incompatible with NOD's SSL protocol filtering

Discussion in 'ESET NOD32 Antivirus' started by vtol, Aug 17, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. vtol

    vtol Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    Posts:
    774
    Location:
    just around the next corner
    OS WIN 7 64 bit / NOD 4.2.58.3

    Virus signature database: 5373 (20100817)
    Update module: 1031 (20091029)
    Antivirus and antispyware scanner module: 1284 (20100729)
    Advanced heuristics module: 1112 (20100813)
    Archive support module: 1121 (20100813)
    Cleaner module: 1048 (20091123)
    Anti-Stealth support module: 1020 (20100713)
    SysInspector module: 1216 (20100517)
    [noparse]Self-defense support module : 1017 (2010072:cool:[/noparse]
    Real-time file system protection module: 1004 (20100727)

    client (C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Games for Windows - LIVE\Client\GFWLive.exe) is communicating via SSL port 443 with the MS sever. with NOD SSL protocol filtering enabled and the client not excluded from SSL protocol filtering the connection will terminate, showing an error

    17-08-2010 17-46-21.png

    adding to the list of applications - firefox, filezilla, media center update - which NOD's SSL protocol filtering is incompatible with. question though - Eset bothered with getting it fixed?
     
  2. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,374
    What other security solutions scan SSL traffic of these applications?
     
  3. vtol

    vtol Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    Posts:
    774
    Location:
    just around the next corner
    what other security solutions is this forum about? thought it is about NOD, no? do you want to start comparison shuffle or stay on topic?
     
  4. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,374
    No. I explained before why these problems occur. We need to know what other security vendors can scan SSL traffic of these applications as it's technically impossible to do that.
     
  5. vtol

    vtol Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2010
    Posts:
    774
    Location:
    just around the next corner
    not sure about other products, since still using NOD... and Prevx, maybe someone else deployed a SSL scanner product to share experience.


    Media Centre updater and games for windows live are perhaps not such so much of entries for malicious stuff. FF you explained, too bad to drop it then as SSL scanning for a web browser should be a standard. Filezilla would be nice to have SSL scanning though as being a ftp client and thus a massive file exchanger with various sources - maybe one day...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.