NEW:Ultimate-Defrag 1.44

Discussion in 'backup, imaging & disk mgmt' started by Legendkiller, Feb 22, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Legendkiller

    Legendkiller Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Posts:
    1,052
    Changes in UltimateDefrag Version 1.44 (21 February 2007)

    *************************************************************************************
    Download:http://www.disktrix.com/ultimatedefrag/ultimatedefragdownload.htm
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 22, 2007
  2. Huupi

    Huupi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2006
    Posts:
    2,024
    A great app steadily becomes greater !!!
     
  3. pvsurfer

    pvsurfer Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,400
    Location:
    California - USA
    I just updated to v1.44 from v1.39 and tried the new automatic setting 'OptiSeek' (described above) with the slider set to Optimum. After this defrag, I find my HDD performance to be slower than when I used the 'Consolidate' setting with 'Respect Archive' and 'Place Directories Next to MFT' checked.

    Since my results seems to contradict the purpose of the new OptiSeek feature I would be interested in the observations of other users of UltimateDefrag.
     
  4. Legendkiller

    Legendkiller Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Posts:
    1,052
    even i use the "consolidate" method.i think its the best,will try this new one later....strange that its causing slowness..
     
  5. WSFuser

    WSFuser Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Posts:
    10,632
    i tried the new auto method (aka OptiSeek) but all it did was put all my data to the outer tracks.

    this could also be done by using consolidate without the performance and archive options.
     
  6. sweater

    sweater Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Posts:
    1,674
    Location:
    Philippines, the Political Dynasty Capital of the
    Again, I will wait... coz this was still in version 1. :D
     
  7. ErikAlbert

    ErikAlbert Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2005
    Posts:
    9,455
    I also will wait until PerfectDisk is worned out on my harddisk. Defraggers never fascinated me.
     
  8. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,456
    I will try the new feature when I had some time... :)
     
  9. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,456
    The new feature didn't slow down my system...

    It seems a nice feature for those that haven't much skills...
     
  10. MotoMax

    MotoMax Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2007
    Posts:
    1
    Testing UD, seems pretty good with all the different options.

    Does anyone know why it takes so long for the defragger to move the same file compared to me making a "copy" of the file in Explorer?
    700mb
    - defrag around 5 mins
    - Explorer 50 seconds.

    When I watch it move the files, the HD sounds like its working hard but the result is very slow. Another thing I noticed is the Disk view shows Moving Orange boxes for a second then they are back to blue. Is this a GUI bug? I like to see Moving until its done moving. Otherwise it looks like it hunged, not colors and don't show the filename. This is noticeable with large files.
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2007
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.