New p2p-virus....Win32.Polipos ?

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by izi, Apr 20, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. rothko

    rothko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Posts:
    579
    Location:
    UK
    for the same reason as other AVs that scored below 100% I imagine: the method of detection isn't good enough
     
  2. Detox

    Detox Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    8,507
    Location:
    Texas, USA
    In post #42 IBK has it listed as detecting all variants he has.
     
  3. Stefan Kurtzhals

    Stefan Kurtzhals AV Expert

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2003
    Posts:
    702
    Seems some tester didn't replicate enough samples and used goat files that are too similar to each other.
     
  4. izi

    izi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Posts:
    354
    Location:
    Slovenia
  5. RejZoR

    RejZoR Lurker

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    Thats odd regarding NOD32:doubt:
     
  6. Inspector Clouseau

    Inspector Clouseau AV Expert

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Posts:
    1,329
    Location:
    Maidenhead, UK
    Fortinet W32/Polipos.A 49,7%
    F-Prot P2P-Worm.Win32.Polip.a 95,2%
    F-Secure W32/Polipos.V12 100,0%

    The result table is messed up.
    F-secure never calls it "W32/Polipos.V12" - thats the Fortinet Name and F-Prot has the KAV/F-Secure detection name
     
  7. izi

    izi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Posts:
    354
    Location:
    Slovenia
    That's true. This table is realy strange. I hope that NOD32 and Kaspersky detect this file 100%.
     
  8. Inspector Clouseau

    Inspector Clouseau AV Expert

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Posts:
    1,329
    Location:
    Maidenhead, UK
    Of course it's true when i write that - i do not fool around with technical postings :D
     
  9. izi

    izi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Posts:
    354
    Location:
    Slovenia
    Sorry my master :rolleyes: :D :D :p
     
  10. Firefighter

    Firefighter Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2002
    Posts:
    1,670
    Location:
    Finland
    My guess is that the publisher has just messed up some items in certain column concerning those sample names, nothing more. Kaspersky and F-secure were still able to detect them all according to that sample name by KAV. :) So NOD still was unable to detect them all.

    Btw. If you can't detect them all with polymorphics, is it the same as you just can't prevent that infection at all?
    So, all detection percents below 100 % has no implication at all.

    Best regards,
    Firefighter!
     
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2006
  11. arleetel

    arleetel Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Posts:
    14
    Panda Antivirus detected and deleted the virus, but I did read all you guys posting and this made me quite anxious that it isn't that simple.
    I ran a removal tool (only for the memory) from Bit Defender and nothing was found.
    http://www.bitdefender.com/VIRUS-1000066-en--Win32.Polipos.A.html
    Does this mean that my computer is clean ?
     
  12. dan_maran

    dan_maran Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Posts:
    1,053
    Location:
    98031
    I would run a online scan from a company that detects 100% of the virus.
    or a stand alone from a bootCD to be completely safe.
     
  13. arleetel

    arleetel Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Posts:
    14
    Thank you for your reply !
    Did an on-line scan with Norton and there was no more detection, compressed files are not scanned but Panda did remove a few .exe files that probably got infected through the execution of only two downloaded infected .exe files (p2p), the other ones (rar files) were not executed but removed by Panda.
    I hope this is the end of it.
    Greetings.
     
  14. Patriots

    Patriots Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Posts:
    11
    Did panda delete the files or renamed them?
    When I had the problem about a week ago and it could not delete the virus.

    Also what version are you using?

    I had to use Doctor Web's Cure it to Get rid of it.
     
  15. arleetel

    arleetel Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Posts:
    14
    I use Panda Internet Security 2005 version 9.02.03 with TruPrevent and Panda moved the files in quanrantine and I could delete them.
     
  16. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
  17. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
  18. SteveAW

    SteveAW Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Posts:
    2
    Re: New p2p-virus....Win32.Polipos Mabey FIX?

    I got the Win32.Polip virus and have worked for a week trying to get rid of it
    I ran BitDefender on all my files and it said it fixed the files (it changed the Icon to a dos Icon), only Norton and AVG still found the virus in the files that BitDefender said it fixed.
    I ran Dr. Web and it said all the files were clean, but the exe were dead! And I didn't want to delete them.
    I got a bright idea (very seldom do I get those) and changed the extension from exe to zip on several of these files.
    I ran Dr. Web again and it found the virus and cured it
    I changed the extension back to exe and the icon changed back to original.
    I ran Norton and Avg on these files and NO VIRUS WAS DETECTED.
    I installed the programs with no hitch. Checked my system for Virus's and everything was Clear.
    This Worked for me I hope it works for you.
    Steve
     
  19. dan_maran

    dan_maran Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Posts:
    1,053
    Location:
    98031
    Re: New p2p-virus....Win32.Polipos Mabey FIX?

    Nice work around Steve.
     
  20. SteveAW

    SteveAW Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Posts:
    2
    Just a note for what I did on clearing the Win32.polip I changed the extension with Norton running then diabled it when I ran Dr. Web. Dr Web said the files were ok until I disabled Norton, then Dtr. Web found the virus in the new extension and cured it. I changed the extension back and then enabled Norton again
     
  21. Inspector Clouseau

    Inspector Clouseau AV Expert

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Posts:
    1,329
    Location:
    Maidenhead, UK
    Peter Ferrie released his Polipop Write-Up
    http://pferrie.tripod.com/vb/polip.pdf

    Especially interesting is what he states in the Conclusion at the end of this article about Dr.Web ;)
    Doesn't this sound somehow familar what other AV people said before? :D
     
  22. Durad

    Durad Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2005
    Posts:
    594
    Location:
    Canada
    If we summarize all it look like that for some people its hard to detect and requre a lot of work while for some others its easy :ninja:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.