New In Threatfire V4.1

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by guest, Feb 18, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    11,126
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    Well, i scripted a VBScript to add to run and sure enough the same old ways cropped up again leaving only to allow it or carry off REGEDIT to quarantine, no DENY option to prevent this at all yet once again.

    I duno why they don't just get off the pot and place a DENY option in there and be done with it. It would save a lot of frustration and disappointments being lodged against TF as of late.

    EASTER
     
  2. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Posts:
    5,857
    Easter,

    Did you send the VB-script to TF support?

    Cheers
     
  3. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    11,126
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    We are in communication now directly, yes.

    EASTER
     
  4. Yoda1953

    Yoda1953 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Posts:
    163
    Location:
    Netherlands
    I posted this problem at their forum, they said they would take note.

    I solved the problem by installing the 4.0 version and let it smart update. Now it's ok.

    Cheers.
     
  5. ViVek

    ViVek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Posts:
    584
    Location:
    Moon
    On my pc Threat fire eats 99-92% of cpu is that normalo_Oo_Oo_Oo_Oo_O
    thats tooooooooooooooooo much
    can anyone help me?
    win xp home sp3
    for example
    kaspersky eats 5%
     
  6. Kees1958

    Kees1958 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Posts:
    5,857
    deinstall asap
     
  7. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,537
    This version is lighter than previous, but I think it still use a lot of system resources...
    I'm not talking about RAM or CPU, but the rest...

    If our system isn't doing nothing, why the program should always check the system?
    The hook instructions doesn't fire this way, right?

    I also tried it against keyloggers without any success...
     
  8. ViVek

    ViVek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Posts:
    584
    Location:
    Moon
    ok,but what is "asap"
    maybe
    As Soon As Possible?
     
  9. GES/POR

    GES/POR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,490
    Location:
    Armacham
    as soon as possible
     
  10. ViVek

    ViVek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Posts:
    584
    Location:
    Moon
    ok but why Pc tools make a software that eats 90% of cpu??
     
  11. RejZoR

    RejZoR Lurker

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    ThreatFire uses around 0-5% on my Atom 1,6GHz based netbook.
    Considering how weak this CPU is, any dual core CPU above 2GHz could run it with ease.
     
  12. ViVek

    ViVek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Posts:
    584
    Location:
    Moon
    i got celeron 1.6 asus laptop 1 core 1,5 gb ram
    threat fire eats 99-92 cpu usage
    win xp home sp3 without net frame work
     
  13. Fuzzfas

    Fuzzfas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2007
    Posts:
    2,753
    There must be some conflict between Threatfire and some other program you run at startup.
     
  14. ViVek

    ViVek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Posts:
    584
    Location:
    Moon
    on startup i got
    Ad muncher 4.72(full from polish magazine)
    kaspersky av 2009
    autoconnect(conect automaticly to internet ADSL)
    power gear(power managment for my asus)
    process lasso
    o o clevar cache v4

    Thats all
     
  15. Fuzzfas

    Fuzzfas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2007
    Posts:
    2,753
    Maybe it's Kaspersky... Anyway, here's the official TF forum, you may want to report it and they may have means of solving your problem:

    http://www.pctools.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=59
     
  16. ViVek

    ViVek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Posts:
    584
    Location:
    Moon
    no its not kaspesky
    few days ago i tested avira free and there was the same problem
     
  17. Fuzzfas

    Fuzzfas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2007
    Posts:
    2,753
    Well, it can even be a hardware driver you have that doesn't like TF and makes it go mad... In such cases, you fix it with trial and error. Maybe in the TF forum, they can give you some debug version or something and find the problem quicker.

    Otherwise, nobody can guess what's your problem, unless he is a magician.

    One thing is for sure, it's not normal for TF to eat 99% of a 1,6 Ghz CPU. Not by a long shot.
     
  18. ViVek

    ViVek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Posts:
    584
    Location:
    Moon
    ok thanks
     
  19. progress

    progress Guest

    Any other experiences?

    I'm running ThreatFire on my laptop for about 2 months and there was no ThreatFire action. So is it really "necessary"? :rolleyes:

    On the other side it slows down browsing a little bit ... :doubt:
     
  20. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,024
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    I would not use this criteria to select my security software ;)

    Depends on your surfing habits and what other software you have installed.
    I have not seen this on my laptop, but you could try another HIPS/behaviour blocker to see whether they slow down your browsing.

    Overall it is running as light as a feather here.
     
  21. 19monty64

    19monty64 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Posts:
    1,302
    Location:
    Nunya, BZ
    Have you tried other browsers. I experienced slow-down with Opera (upload-speeds dropped right off) but no difference with Chrome or FF. No diff with IE8 either :shifty:
     
  22. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    11,126
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    Hey fellas

    I been out of the loop for a week or so and was curious as well as anxious if TF is finally updated another version yet or are we still chained down with the same one with no DENY feature as well as all the improvements proposed some many months and weeks ago.

    I not given up on it nor want to, but it's been a very long delay IMO between the last version and the talk up of releasing an even better one.

    Thanks EASTER
     
  23. Victek

    Victek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Posts:
    6,220
    Location:
    USA
    .
    As far as I know the "deny" option has not been implemented yet. I believe in 4.1 they dropped the AV database component. I only tested it briefly though, so correct me if I'm wrong. I'm patiently waiting too for a version of TF that I can really trust.
     
  24. raven211

    raven211 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2005
    Posts:
    2,567
    Dropping the AV db should not be an "issue" according to them anyway - only solve conflict-problems and such. What was in effective use was TF's own black and white databases - and now the software features cloud-updating/db in addition to the regular updates.
     
  25. EASTER

    EASTER Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2007
    Posts:
    11,126
    Location:
    U.S.A. (South)
    I hope i.m wrong but with this long absence originatig for the PCTools camp, it;s beginning to look strikingly similar to the same demise that plagued Power Shadow Master & the other chinese HIPS which was a real step in the right direction.

    This seemingly very long delay without concrete explaination except broken record canned responses from it's forum doesn;t exactly encourage expectations expected many hoped for that it will ever make it to either distribution or market, which would be a yet another let down for users full of anticipation and hope in it.

    But like i said, i hope i'm wrong but the longer they continue to put matters off with TF the more it signals to me IMO there could be other alternatives than the work on that particular TF project in exchange for some other priorities (if they have any ).

    TF IMO is been very prime to take a positive popular center stage stance if they can or are able to press on ahead with it sooner then later.

    Interest is serious waining at this point and users are definitely losing hope if they ever see this project materialize.

    EASTER
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.