Netsky.P

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by Rouge.it, Sep 20, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Rouge.it

    Rouge.it Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Posts:
    6
    Location:
    Salsomaggiore Terme, PR - Italy
    After last update, NOD32 seems not to recognize the Netsky.P virus anymore. Any suggestion ?
     
  2. NOD32 user

    NOD32 user Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Posts:
    1,766
    Location:
    Australia
    Why do you say that?

    Cheers :)
     
  3. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,374
    There must be some problem, send the file to support @ eset.com with a link to this thread and we'll have a look into it.
     
  4. Rouge.it

    Rouge.it Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Posts:
    6
    Location:
    Salsomaggiore Terme, PR - Italy
  5. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,374
    Since we haven't received anything yet, please re-send the file in an encrypted WinRAR/ZIP archive and protected with the password "infected".
     
  6. Rouge.it

    Rouge.it Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Posts:
    6
    Location:
    Salsomaggiore Terme, PR - Italy
    Done; now something is changed. Here's the last report for the sample file from virus total:

    Antivirus Version Update Result
    NOD32v2 1.1764 09.20.2006 Win32/Netsky.Q
     
  7. webyourbusiness

    webyourbusiness Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2004
    Posts:
    2,640
    Location:
    Throughout the USA and Canada
    no netsky definitions in the updates for a while though...
     
  8. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    Have you scanned it only on virustotal and jotti's ??
    If so, there could have been a problem with them. They are not alwasy so accurate, at least Jotti's.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.