Hi All, I have been wandering around on various antivirus forums to find what I should be using. And, everyone pretty much seems to agree that NOD32 is one of the best, if not the best "paid" (best in terms of the optimization between quality and lightness) antivirus software. Likewise, the best free antivirus software is dubbed as either avast or antivir. The common thing, in almost all of these forums though is that, everyone bashes Norton AV, and says it misses viruses, it is a resource hog, this that. What I don't understand is that, according to independent/reputable antivirus comparison sites, NAV performs quite well.. For example, according to both: http://www.av-comparatives.org/ http://www.virus.gr/english/fullxml/ NAV performs really well. At least it is definitely better than Avast/Antivir in terms of detection rate. I can understand that NAV's home edition is slow and such a big resource hog, but NAV Corporate Edition is pretty light weight, and it does not put too much load on the system. Could someone please explain what is the reason of this discrepancy, and why people hate NAV so much? Thanks..