Mozilla Firefox Browser Stable Version Releases

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by JRViejo, Mar 18, 2014.

  1. plat

    plat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2018
    Posts:
    2,233
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Here's something good Mozilla has done, and it has kept its promise. I will see how well this works when the time comes. It's not here yet (talking about Manifest v3). You go, Moz. :thumb:

    https://adguard.com/en/blog/firefox-manifestv3-chrome-adblocking.html

     
  2. Sampei Nihira

    Sampei Nihira Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2013
    Posts:
    3,367
    Location:
    Italy
  3. nicolaasjan

    nicolaasjan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2018
    Posts:
    890
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    As I understand from this article on Mozilla Add-ons Community Blog, they will deprecate MV2 extensions just like Google will do:
    So, does this mean that MV2 extensions that are no longer maintained will just stop working? :eek:

    For example, I rely heavily on the "Open With" extension, mainly to open video links in MPV media player or download them with yt-dlp.
    https://i.postimg.cc/Y0Qx3dBC/Screenshot-20230520.png
    In that case I'll have to switch to the latest MV2 compatible Firefox ESR release after the change lands in Stable, or use the Pale Moon browser for that extension.
    (version 6.8.6 still works on it)
    Code:
    https://ca-archive.us.to/storage/11/11097/open_with-6.8.6-fx+sm+tb.xpi
     
  4. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,931
    MV3 is no problem for regular extensions, but for ad blockers and similar web filtering extensions due the limits. as far i understood mozilla wont set a limit and wont deprecate the current api. because this wopuld mean that current mv2 extension are no longer usable and this ofc would mean that a lot of users will leave firefox. mozilla never wont do this. why? because they wont lose windows 7 users and get them uplifted to a current OS with no problems, if this would mean windows or some kind of linux.

    where i see issues:
    this would mean that it wont be possible to load different lists like now. static lists are death of any decent blocker. for windows this could mean for me to switch to adguard app and kick any other kind of static blocking extension.
     
  5. Libraman

    Libraman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2016
    Posts:
    202
  6. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,931
    thank you :) PiP issues are noticed in some forums.
     
  7. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,050
    Location:
    U.S.A.
  8. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,050
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    FYI. Schedule Update.
     
  9. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,050
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    FYI. Schedule Update.
     
  10. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,931
    The end is set for firefox on windows 7/8/8.1
    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-users-windows-7-8-and-81-moving-extended-support

    channel will be switched to 115 ESR, further builds will probably include a kill switch like v53 for XP

    edit:

    mozilla has fixed a long being issue.
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1813618

    "speculative connect"
    when choosing a bookmark from address-bar firefox is checking connection, but not loading anything.

    Dont want it?
    "browser.urlbar.speculativeConnect.enabled" <-- "false"
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2023
  11. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,050
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    FYI. Schedule Update.
     
  12. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,931
    v114 on june, 6
    https://whattrainisitnow.com/calendar/ (<-- new site for https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/Calendar)
     
  13. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,050
    Location:
    U.S.A.
  14. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,050
    Location:
    U.S.A.
  15. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,050
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    FYI. Schedule Update.
     
  16. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,050
    Location:
    U.S.A.
  17. Stupendous Man

    Stupendous Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2010
    Posts:
    2,861
    Location:
    the Netherlands
    Is it only the new DNS over HTTPS menu that is now available in Firefox 114 settings, or is Firefox DoH now available worldwide?
    Earlier, Firefox DNS over HTTPS was only available in selected regions, like the USA, Canada, Ukraine, and Russia, if I'm not mistaken. I found no up-to-date documentation specifying in which regions Firefox DoH is actually available, currently.

    Firefox DNS over HTTPS may be helpful if you're in a country where your ISP may collect and sell personal information, or when you use public Wi-Fi.
    If that is not the case, I doubt if one needs Firefox DoH. I guess the question is whether you trust an available DoH provider better than your default DNS resolver.
    In the new DNS over HTTPS menu, I selected Off, to disable Firefox DoH.
     
  18. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,050
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    Off was the default, and I kept it that way. :)
     
  19. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Posts:
    5,931
    i think no limits, i can chose 1 of 3 preset services. in about:config you can set some more.
     
  20. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,050
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    FYI. Schedule Update.
     
  21. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,050
    Location:
    U.S.A.
  22. Raza0007

    Raza0007 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    Posts:
    1,691
    Location:
    USA

    In the US it is critical that you use DoH or DoT or something similar to hide your browsing history from your ISP, because ISPs here are legally allowed to collect and sell your private data, without your consent, since 2017.

    https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/03/senate-votes-to-let-isps-sell-your-web-browsing-history-to-advertisers/

    Here is an article about a 2021 FTC investigation into what ISPs are collecting about users in US. The link to the full FTC report is in the article.

    https://restoreprivacy.com/internet-service-providers-isp-privacy-data-collection/
     
  23. JRViejo

    JRViejo Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Posts:
    98,050
    Location:
    U.S.A.
  24. Stupendous Man

    Stupendous Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2010
    Posts:
    2,861
    Location:
    the Netherlands
    Thanks, Raza.
    Yes, I read that in the US your ISP could collect and sell your data, but I didn't know that it was even as terrible as that the Senate voted to eliminate broadband privacy rules. In that case, using DoH may be helpful. Although I think I read it still leaves the ISP room to collect data.
     
  25. Stupendous Man

    Stupendous Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2010
    Posts:
    2,861
    Location:
    the Netherlands
    In the Firefox DNS-over-HTTPS support article, the About our rollout of DNS over HTTPS section still says:
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.