Mozilla Celebrates a Year of Shrinking Firefox Memory

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by Hungry Man, Jun 15, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,148
  2. 1chaoticadult

    1chaoticadult Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2010
    Posts:
    2,248
    Location:
    Chaotic Land
    It definitely has gotten a lot better.
     
  3. Tsast42

    Tsast42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Posts:
    137
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    It's kind of characteristic of Mozilla though that they've solved the longstanding memory bloat just when memory has stopped being such a serious issue for most people.
     
  4. Daveski17

    Daveski17 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Posts:
    8,028
    Location:
    Lloegyr
    Hurrah! We are celebrating, right?
     
  5. Tsast42

    Tsast42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Posts:
    137
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Sounds like someone's calling me a grump :ouch:
     
  6. Daveski17

    Daveski17 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Posts:
    8,028
    Location:
    Lloegyr
    I was just being a little ironic. I mean, of all the things to celebrate, shrinking memory loss is not a exactly a jubilee is it? More like a half pint of slightly warm mild ale sitting in a corner of a dark pub. ;)

    I'd be more likely to celebrate if Mozilla stopped trying to emulate Google, had a realistic upgrade cycle & fixed the main problems. Then I may party a little ...
     
  7. culla

    culla Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Posts:
    504
    what's the main problems?
     
  8. Daveski17

    Daveski17 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Posts:
    8,028
    Location:
    Lloegyr
    Where do I start? Seriously though, Firefox/Waterfox is working well on my desktop but I have noticed problems with responsiveness on notebooks/laptops that I have used. The tabs seem to be taking a lot of RAM & right-click drop down menus aren't very responsive when you first try to use them. SeaMonkey seems to be inheriting some of these problems so I reckon it's a Gecko thing. I really think that a lot of problems people are having with Firefox, which is contributing to it being less used, stem from the rapid release cycles that Mozilla are trying to emulate Chrome with.
     
  9. tlu

    tlu Guest

    I haven't noticed that. However, improvements arriving in FF15 (mentioned here , further details here) might alleviate your problems.

    I've been watching the Memshrink project from its start and think that they've done a really good job. An interesting site related to that project is https://areweslimyet.com/
     
  10. Daveski17

    Daveski17 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Posts:
    8,028
    Location:
    Lloegyr
    I've noticed the problems I discussed earlier on more than one computer, although both only had 2 Gb of RAM or less, I've noticed the same thing on SeaMonkey (to a lesser extent). It could be an extension issue, but it doesn't explain why none of these problems manifest on my powerful 64 bit PC. No other browser on my notebook suffers from this problem. I've been told that a lot of processes run on Fx tabs & that could be a factor. It's no accident I'm having to make this reply in Opera 12.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.