Most Cost Effective Server A/V?

What are peoples thoughts on the best combination of value and performance for A/V for Windows servers?

Ideally something that isn't licensed on the number of users, and that isn't hundreds of dollars per server would be useful.

Trend seem to be dropping support for ServerProtect and trying to push people towards using OfficeScan on servers, maybe I'm being paranoid I'm just not a huge fan of what seems like desktop A/V on servers.

 

Hello hutchingsp,
how many servers does your company have?
what server OS are you running? windows server 2003?
guessing file servers?
i can see what you mean about using what is bacially the desktop av but your paying tons more for it because its a server.
i think the best way to work this out is to contact quite a few av vendors and see what they can offer you.
after all businesses always get better support than home users.

 

Around 25 or so, all Windows 2003.

Our Trend suite covers us for client and servers, any combination for the number of staff we have, which is a few hundred.

When it comes up for renewal in around six months time I shall be looking closely at all the options, but with virtualization these days it's so easy to be adding a server that I don't want to have to think "Oh I need to buy an additional license" etc.

 

Antivirus for Microsoft Exchange Server?

I'm currently using Scanmail, I intend to look at NOD32 and Kaspersky.

Who else are people using and what have your experiences been please?

Exchange 2003 SP2.

 

Re: Antivirus for Microsoft Exchange Server?

Don't know much about these, but http://solutions.drweb.com/exchange/ for Dr.Web's product.

 

Any thoughts on F-Secure anyone?

 

f-secure uses kaspersky engine with extended bases.
along with f-secure own engine,blacklight for rootkits
along with a few other f-secure engines.
used to be quite heavy but its lighter now and is getting lighter with every new version.
very decent package IMO

 

Hmm I didn't know that, perhaps it's as silly as the name beginning "f-" but I'd got it into my head that it used to use the frisk/f-prot engine, though that was some years back.

I'm asking because it appears ludicrously cheap i.e. we could almost afford to cover everything, desktops, file servers, exchange servers, for the cost of renewing our existing Scanmail license alone.

Where's the catch?!

 

Hello,
yes it did used to use the frisk/f-prot engine, the current versions still have the f-prot macro engine. but this has been taken out in the lastest beta.
there is no catch. its a great product.

 

Certainly that is almost the single most important factor as people tend to notice lack of an email service before they notice anything else.

The silly thing is that we have a linux/postfix/mailscanner/clamav box at the perimeter that tends to stop/detect most stuff on the way in, I could count on two hands the number of viruses Scanmail has had to deal with in the last twelve months, which makes me almost reluctant to spend the money, but of course it's my ass on the line and common sense says I need something on the Exchange boxes.

Of course tied in with that is that in six months desktops/servers are up for renewal and if it's the same vendor for everything there are savings to be had in a suite vs. several products.