Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.51.2.1300

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by The Seeker, Sep 12, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Posts:
    6,944
    Location:
    USA
    Okay, if your on-demand scans are taking a long time, then disabling your AV when you scan with MBAM will improve the time dramatically.
    If you don't, then VIPRE is scanning everything that MBAM is scanning.
    Try it.
    :)
     
  2. Dermot7

    Dermot7 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Posts:
    3,430
    Location:
    Surrey, England.
    Yes you're right, thanks Page42....found today that disabling Vipre, scan took only 4min 21secs, found disabling Shuriken module in Scanner settings (with Vipre enabled) scan took 6min 25secs. But with both Vipre and Shuriken enabled it was back to painfully slow scans.
     
  3. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Posts:
    6,944
    Location:
    USA
    Problem solved then.
    One in a row for me.
    ;)
    I'm glad that helped, Dermot7.
     
  4. TheMozart

    TheMozart Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2010
    Posts:
    1,486
  5. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Posts:
    6,944
    Location:
    USA
    Which explains the OP's slow scanning speed? :rolleyes:
     
  6. m0use0ver

    m0use0ver Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Posts:
    81
    Odd that they use 2010 test result dont you think for a download today?

    Maybe they should use 2011 results as they are more relevent and current:thumb:

    Mindyou they probaly wont use those figures as Malwarebytes are peforming better then they are in the current MRG flash tests :cool:
     
  7. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Posts:
    6,944
    Location:
    USA
    More relevant?
    More current?
    Performing better?
    Well aren't you a stickler for detail!
    ;) :thumb:
     
  8. TheMozart

    TheMozart Former Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2010
    Posts:
    1,486

    Ok, can you post the 2011 results? I look forward to seeing them. :thumb:
     
  9. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    8,738
    Working great with no problems. I think its Web Blocking is better (faster) than before with handling new ignored sites (not sure if this version caused that).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.