Malware Defender - Possible Leak!

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by wat0114, Sep 8, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Alcyon

    Alcyon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Posts:
    438
    Location:
    Montr?al, Canada
    I see nothing wrong with this rule. In the file module, if explorer.exe allows all operations (create, read , modify & delete) then the unconventional/suspicious parent operations on explorer (related with the file AND application modules) should give a prompt or be blocked. I haven't played with MD since ages so i don't remember if it's the case with the default rules.
     
  2. demoneye

    demoneye Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Posts:
    1,356
    Location:
    ISRHell
    hi there Xiaolin :)

    problem solved , removed file rule ;)
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2009
  3. nick s

    nick s Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Posts:
    1,430
    Do you get the same result after you restore the default rules (Rule > Restore Default Rules) and delete/disable the default File rule for explorer.exe? If you don't, then you have a rule problem.
     
  4. demoneye

    demoneye Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Posts:
    1,356
    Location:
    ISRHell
    this way its work ! BUT i didnt add / modify any rules ! i just put MD in learn mode , after the switch it like u all did to normal and problem accrue .


    any way , now its working even with my "old" ( 3 days rules) :D
    does removing the file rule from explorer.exe makle MD weaker? or what is the consequence of disable/delete it?

    cheers
     
  5. nick s

    nick s Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Posts:
    1,430
    Not weaker. Possibly more noisy. You might see some alerts for a while or you may see none (which is my experience). It depends on your usage. Learning Mode, for you, obviously created some rule that led to what you saw.
     
  6. arran

    arran Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Posts:
    1,156
    after having another look at wat0114 screenie from the first post and having an understanding of how md works I can now see a picture of what basically happened.

    wat0114 attempts to change the file name. explorer.exe allows it to be changed because explorer has default permit rules.

    Windows File Protection kicks in ie winlogon.exe attempts to change it back, on MD winlogon.exe doesn't have any file rules. "MD works from bottom going up"

    winlogon.exe doesn't have any file rules so it works its way up. wat0114 obviously doesn't have any file rules on the default applications group. so it goes up to the system executable files which have an "ASK" rule so a popup will appear. wat0114 doesn't realise that winlogon.exe is trying to repair the damage so he clicks deny on the pop up.
     
  7. cqpreson

    cqpreson Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2009
    Posts:
    348
    Location:
    China
    :eek: ,does that mean winlogon.exe has a function which repairs other system files?

    But the rule of explorer.exe in MD need configuring by users.It is a difficult and onerous job
     
  8. arran

    arran Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Posts:
    1,156
    no its not its very easy to configure explorer.exe file rules.
     
  9. wat0114

    wat0114 Guest

    Nice detective work arran :thumb: You are right, no file rule for winlogon.exe - it is only a target application of svchost.exe. And now I understand what nick s was alluding to in his post #3:

    Even though in admin account it is possible to rename the protected file, winlogon somehow is instrumental in creating another copy of the original file name. I tried again this time with MD disabled and renaming xcopy.exe. Screenshot below of results.
     

    Attached Files:

  10. peteck

    peteck Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2008
    Posts:
    10
    Location:
    Far Eastern Australia
    Clarified already :)

    I don't see this behaviour by winlogon.exe because WFP is disabled on my setup.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.