IObit Security 360 Beta Released

Discussion in 'other anti-malware software' started by Phenom, Jun 8, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BrendanK.

    BrendanK. Guest

    You have to manually download it if you want it straight away. The updater will update the program automatically in 1-2 days time :)
     
  2. clocks

    clocks Registered Member


    So the real-time protection has not been fixed yet?
     
  3. Atomas31

    Atomas31 Registered Member

    If this is the case, I believe it should be a top priority...
     
  4. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    agreed
     
  5. cqpreson

    cqpreson Registered Member

    Low detection rates impressed me.
     
  6. BrendanK.

    BrendanK. Guest

    The real-time protection is a top priority and every update brings Security 360 closer to a fix. The developers are spending all the time they can fixing it, so please be patient :)
     
  7. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    looking forward to it :)
     
  8. BrendanK.

    BrendanK. Guest

    Alright Security 360 users, I need your opinion.

    Security 360 already detects keyloggers, however, it does not detect some commercial ones as they cannot be used for malicious purposes unless installed by a person with direct access to the computer.

    So my question is, should Security 360 detect these 'commercial' keyloggers? This is purely based on your opinion and feedback will go towards the developers.
     
  9. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    id say YES, it shuld detect commercial keyloggers. :thumb:
     
  10. BrendanK.

    BrendanK. Guest

    Ok, may I ask why?

    Please keep in mind that by commercial keyloggers, I mean ones that can only be installed through direct physical access to a computer.
     
  11. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    because i have family and friends i dont trust (like when i go to the washroom) :D :D
     
  12. clocks

    clocks Registered Member

    I say concentrate on other aspects at this point, especially the realtime prevention....thanks
     
  13. BrendanK.

    BrendanK. Guest

    Hehe. We can't have everyone focusing on that. That is for the developers ;)
     
  14. cqpreson

    cqpreson Registered Member

    If IObit Security 360 has a large definition,it will be better.But the speed to deal with the sample which users upload is good.
     
  15. LagerX

    LagerX Registered Member

    I've seen video and it really does its job.
    Test system had lot of rogues etc and it removed all of them. Only left 5 samples on system (out of 250 infected files)
     
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2009
  16. Sjoeii

    Sjoeii Registered Member

    I would say YES as well. The more detection the better
     
  17. Atomas31

    Atomas31 Registered Member


    I would also say Yes with a warning that the keylogger detected is a commercial keylogger that could have been install by a person with direct access to the computer (something like that ;) )

    The reason is the fact that a keylogger commercial or not is a security risk for wich I want to be warn about...
     
  18. demoneye

    demoneye Registered Member

    loud YES , since this kinda stuff always can be used badly , so Security 360 MUST detect it , and mention aside the "infected" file , "commercial software" or something like that


    cheers :)
     
  19. the Tester

    the Tester Registered Member

    Yes.
    Maybe have a warning that categorizes the detection as "a commercial keylogger."
     
  20. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    agreed
     
  21. BrendanK.

    BrendanK. Guest

    Alright. Thank you for your suggestions :) We will classify all commericial keyloggers as PUA (Potentially Unwanted Applications), which will include a description on the type of commercial keylogger. :)
     
  22. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    sounds great, now just gotta have the real-time issue fixed and good to go.
     
  23. Atomas31

    Atomas31 Registered Member

    Agreed :D
     
  24. Frencho

    Frencho Registered Member

    The settings for protection have two options: "high level" and "recommended level" but the default is the former and not the latter. Which one should I choose, then? And what's really the difference between the two? Thank you.
     
  25. BrendanK.

    BrendanK. Guest

    The recommended level is for users who truly believe that they cannot click simple popups which warn them about certain changes to their system.

    The high level allows these popups for the more tech savvy of us :cool:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice