Introducing, The New Prevx Edge.

Discussion in 'Prevx Releases' started by trjam, Nov 13, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. GES/POR

    GES/POR Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,490
    Location:
    Armacham
    If i had to choose id be running Edge with SAS in realtime instead of kav but thats just me
     
  2. Mosqu

    Mosqu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2008
    Posts:
    69
    Location:
    Germany
    Yes, Edge gets its strength from the online community database. Only few detection techniques remain usefull offline. But if you could manage to be online, when you first execute a new program, that should help.

    ... as far as I understand.
     
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2008
  3. guest

    guest Guest

    WOW.
    31 page/753 Post.
     
  4. Killtek

    Killtek Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2007
    Posts:
    100
    PrevX Support: Is PrevXEdge compatible with Zemana's AntiLogger? Or is having NIS 2009, Zemana AntiLogger and PrevX Edge too much?
     
  5. emperordarius

    emperordarius Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Posts:
    1,218
    Location:
    Who cares
    Is there any way to try the cleanup abilities or you have to buy the product first?
     
  6. Baldrick

    Baldrick Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2002
    Posts:
    2,692
    Location:
    South Wales, UK
    This has been raised before and I think that Prevx are considering a 30 day completely unrestricted trial period just so that the cleanup abilities can also be tested...but since this was discussed I have not heard anything more about this.
     
  7. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Posts:
    4,815
    Location:
    Canada
    yep im still waiting on the functional 30 day trial
     
  8. emperordarius

    emperordarius Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Posts:
    1,218
    Location:
    Who cares
    Ah, ok, Looking forward it.
     
  9. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    This is correct - we are still planning the evaluation modifications, but the new design will be coming soon :)
     
  10. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    We haven't experienced any problems with Zemana or NIS, so, it would be worth a try IMO
     
  11. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    We pick and choose what programs we require - we don't grab a copy of every program as that is generally unnecessary and we can gather the behaviors automatically (which saves bandwidth, processing power, etc. over sending the entire file).

    Edge does protect against real keyloggers - AKLT is a leaktest which is not necessarily covered by Edge because it exhibits significantly different behavior from a real, malicious keylogger.
     
  12. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    Mosqu's post accurately describes our system:

    Hope that helps :)
     
  13. jlo

    jlo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2004
    Posts:
    475
    Location:
    UK
    Hi,

    Could someone PM me a sampe submission email address please as I have a file to send in for analysis.

    Cheers

    Jlo
     
  14. Joliet Jake

    Joliet Jake Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Posts:
    911
    Location:
    Scotland
    Going to trial this for a while. I see Defense + in Comodo blocked Prevx Edge from accessing the memory of cmdagent.exe but other than that, smooth as.
     
  15. simmikie

    simmikie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2006
    Posts:
    321
    PH, has Edge been tested against all of the RoBoDoG trojans? could be a set-up question, though it might not be.


    Mike
     
  16. hammerman

    hammerman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Posts:
    283
    Location:
    UK
    Does Prevx EDGE protect against Sinowal/Mebroot trojan?
     
  17. Threedog

    Threedog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Posts:
    1,125
    Location:
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Yuppers. Don't ask me how I know. :D
     
  18. EraserHW

    EraserHW Malware Expert

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Posts:
    588
    Location:
    Italy
    Yes it does. It prevents infections and it has been one of the first scanners (CSI) to detect infections caused by MBR rootkit
     
  19. EraserHW

    EraserHW Malware Expert

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Posts:
    588
    Location:
    Italy
    We've tested Edge against tons of infections and it always succesfully detected and removed them. Anyway, as you can have seen in this thread, if you find out any infection that is not detected by Edge, just PM us :)
     
  20. EraserHW

    EraserHW Malware Expert

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2005
    Posts:
    588
    Location:
    Italy
  21. rendez2k

    rendez2k Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Posts:
    315
    Location:
    UK
    Is there an issue with 1.72 and the tray icon/protection? When Windows loaded this morning I ended up with two icons - one green and one red. The green one goes when I hover over it and I get Prevx dis disabled? And yesterday I had no icon at all!
     
  22. horseman

    horseman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Posts:
    128
    Location:
    Hove - UK
    Known issue apparently and Prevx are working on it. Presumably if you try and re-enable (the red one) PX simply requests a reboot and you loop the same scenario? I've gotten similar scenario from every build from 165 to 185 (only on one testbed though).

    If so one thing you consider trying is a (very)crude work-around (until fix):

    Check if pxark (probably named CSIScanner) in SERVICES(via MMC) is on automatic and has started? (if it hasn't you should also have an entry in SYSTEM event log indicating pxark failed to start before it timed out)

    If it isn't running try manually starting. If this "kicks" PX3 into life then you can semi automate this by using the RECOVERY options for that service by introducing a restart delay. The amount depends on how long the desktop startup takes to stabilise/complete eg in my memory constrained VM test system i used 10min for first and second recovery restarts.

    If above doesn't apply then check you also have SELF PROTECTION option on PX3 disabled.

    hth (I guess I now also have to append disclaimers: I'm not an expert, use at your own risk etc etc)
     
  23. emperordarius

    emperordarius Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Posts:
    1,218
    Location:
    Who cares
    I tried PrevX Edge Protection + Cleanup (I asked at support and they gave me a 7 day license).
    It's still buggy, especially GUI bugs, but I think that they will be fixed quickly.
    The only major problem I had is that I couldn't uninstall correctly, every time I tried I got a BSOD about the pxark.sys driver, I don't remember the BSOD message though, it was probably because the driver couldn't be unloaded. I had to boot into safe mode to uninstall correctly.
     
  24. Hirtzy

    Hirtzy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2008
    Posts:
    17
    Location:
    Australia
    I experienced exactly the same problem. v180 wasn't loading protection at bootup and restarting as suggested didn't work and resulted in an endless loop.

    I then tried to uninstall it and got a prevx messaging saying uninstallation successful but this was quickly followed by a BSOD with an error message reguarding the pxark.sys driver which couldn't be unloaded. Once started up I found that Prevx hadn't been uninstalled as reported by the message box and was forced to use safe mode like emperordarius to uninstall it.

    I am now back to using v172 which appears to be stable on my system but I am unsure whether it will have the same BSOD issue with uninstallations as v180 did. I believe that Prevx are working on a solution to this significant problem and it should be resolved soon. Just out of curiosity which version did u experience the problem with emperordarius?
     
  25. emperordarius

    emperordarius Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2008
    Posts:
    1,218
    Location:
    Who cares
    Exactly the same with me.
    I used the latest version, so I guess it was 180
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice