Introducing AX64 Time Machine - hybrid imaging/snapshot software

Discussion in 'backup, imaging & disk mgmt' started by Isso, Jan 18, 2013.

  1. DVD+R

    DVD+R Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2006
    Posts:
    1,979
    Location:
    The Antipodes
    Sod The Beta's I'll wait for the real thing! BETA's have no place on my computers, never have, never will.
     
  2. enonod

    enonod Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2008
    Posts:
    109
    Location:
    UK
    Returning to posts 6451/3.
    I have now tested the Boot CD produced with 1.4.0.19 beta.

    It is indeed recognised as an EFI disk and produces the required 'press any key to boot from CD/DVD' under UEFI devices and not Legacy Devices.
    However on pressing any key much time is spent waiting until eventually the PC boots from HDD.
    A similar disk from Macrium Reflect does work on the same Drive and using the same batch of CDs.
    Has anybody managed to boot such a CD?

    [Edit]A similar WinPE 4 disk produced from AOMEI does not work either. Is AX64 using WinPE 4?
     
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2014
  3. TheRollbackFrog

    TheRollbackFrog Imaging Specialist

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Posts:
    4,955
    Location:
    The Pond - USA
    Enonod, AX64 uses the WinRE installed on your system when the system was built for its RECOVERY MEDIA.

    Win7: v3
    Win7sp1: v3.1
    Win8: v4
    Win8.1: v5
     
  4. clubhouse1

    clubhouse1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2013
    Posts:
    1,124
    Location:
    UK
    Unless there's some startling new features on future versions I'm more than happy with version 1120....Has never let me down...And I've made good use of it as a 'system fiddler' and trying all kinds of software.
     
  5. enonod

    enonod Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2008
    Posts:
    109
    Location:
    UK
    @TheRollbackFrog: Thanks for responding. OK. I'm not really familiar with the new UEFI system and have been having trouble selecting the boot device (other than HDD) but did get a CD to boot from Macrium.
    Are you saying that the AX64 Boot CD is constructed from WinRE on the system or calls WinRE on the system?
    If either, could this indicate something missing on my system?
    Further guidance would greatly assist.
     
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2014
  6. Acadia

    Acadia Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Posts:
    4,332
    Location:
    US
    That's interesting and you are the second person who has told me that (the other was at another forum). I have also heard that 1.3.07 was very reliable. I wonder which of those two are the most reliable?

    Acadia
     
  7. Chamlin

    Chamlin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2006
    Posts:
    449
    Both worked fine on my system. But so has 1.4.0.19. (Win7 sp1). Grateful.
     
  8. Acadia

    Acadia Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Posts:
    4,332
    Location:
    US
    I had no problems with 19 either until I tried to uninstall it to test an incompatible software program. I had to recover an old ShadowProtect image to get rid of it (then I had to again update my Firefox, anti-Virus, Flash, FoxIt, 17 Microsoft updates ... you get the idea). In all fairness: 19 always worked for me too until I tried to uninstall it.

    Acadia
     
  9. ScottAdams

    ScottAdams Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    Posts:
    36
    I notice there are some *.axtemp in the directory that are very old. Can they be deleted?
     
  10. TheRollbackFrog

    TheRollbackFrog Imaging Specialist

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Posts:
    4,955
    Location:
    The Pond - USA
    Enonod, the AX64 RECOVERY MEDIA actually uses a copy (does not call it) of the WinRE.wim that's located on the built system, then modifies that WIM by adding any unique drivers that currently exist on the system it's doing the build from. WinRE is just a poor man's version of WinPE and isn't nearly as driver rich as WinPE is. AX64 gets around that by adding the drivers it needs for the particular system it's building from. FWIW... the AX64 RECOVERY MEDIA is *NOT* SECURE BOOT enabled (I will be corrected if I'm wrong about this :D ), so if you're running in that mode I'm sure it will fail.

    I have stayed away from using an UEFI-based system as there's just too much non-information floating around about how it all works. The few I have built, I have built as LEGACY MBR-based systems so that compatibility going forward remains as it has always been. This has allowed me to build standard MBR-based systems even thought the BiOS is UEFI-based, and all that I have ever known... remains known :rolleyes:

    When I get a more complete understanding of what UEFI and SECURE BOOT are all about, I will move forward as needed. Wish I could help more...
     
  11. TheRollbackFrog

    TheRollbackFrog Imaging Specialist

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Posts:
    4,955
    Location:
    The Pond - USA
    Scott, that sounds like broken AX64 snaps from long ago... probably can be deleted. The AXTEMP files are only created during MERGE operations and snapshot taking and are eliminated when those operations are complete. If the system is quiet, they sound like leftovers.
     
  12. ScottAdams

    ScottAdams Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    Posts:
    36
    Thanks! I was hoping it was something like that.
     
  13. ratchet

    ratchet Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Posts:
    1,988
    I had hot restore problems (Frozen Desktop) with both until someone (might have been Peter) realized security software might be the problem. I put Malwarebytes service on delayed start and alls well for a few months now. See no reason to leave 1.3.07.
    On another note though, Weather Pulse was this "great" free weather program that the developer had to shutdown because TWC began charging for their data. Recently the developer has brought it back using the NWS for his data. Had a hot restore go bad but new the only change I made was installing WP. Disabled it from starting with windows a few weeks ago and not a problem since. After a boot (or restore) I just start it manually. Point is that security software is not the only thing to look at if there are problems with hot restores.
     
  14. Seven64

    Seven64 Guest

    Just needed to say AX64 Time Machine support is bad, no response in days.
     
  15. bgoodman4

    bgoodman4 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Posts:
    3,237
    Thats not good. Before the merger it used to be terrific.
     
  16. enonod

    enonod Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2008
    Posts:
    109
    Location:
    UK
    @TheRollbackFrog:
    Thank you for that differentiation on WinRE, WinPE.
    I have had Secure Boot off since I discovered that I could not boot from CD.

    I agree regarding UEFI, I have tried to get in depth knowledge but those that explain, seem to be in the same boat, so I will sink with them if they are wrong.
    I have now discovered that CD/DVD boot is no different to Legacy, the problem seems to be setting boot order effectively (it doesn't seem to change anything).
    If I leave it as it is it seems OK, but beta 19 will still not recover from CD, it simply leaves a blue blank screen. I do not think it is a BSOD because there is no messgae and Macrium, if I recall, works but has the same screen blue colour.

    Thank you again for your insight.
     
  17. enonod

    enonod Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2008
    Posts:
    109
    Location:
    UK
    I have also found that there is no response to emails suddenly (2014). I put it down to concentration on the Windows 8.1 problem. My trial is running out soon!
     
  18. Seven64

    Seven64 Guest

    If I knew about a merger I wouldn't have jump on the train so fast.
    Mergers, sellouts for the quick buck, mean trouble for the consumer. Just look at Firstdefense, Online Armor, now sandboxie, and AX64 all have or will go downhill. None have improved, very sad. And the part that gets me, is they say "it will only improve" just like politicians.
     
  19. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Some bad examples here. First Defense is back and improvements have been made. Online Armor doesn't have much room for improvement without a total rewrite. That would never pay for itself. Besides it still does it's job. Sandboxie it is too early to tell. As for Ax64, well hmmm....

    Pete
     
  20. Seven64

    Seven64 Guest

    Frist Defense might be back now, for a hefty yearly price.:thumbd: Your right, a little improvement but not worth the improved price.
    Online Armor wont be a stand alone firewall but will be integrated into EAM (if you are a beta tester you know). :thumbd:
    Sandboxie will follow the trail, high price and not so good. Just looking into my crystal ball. :D
    I respect your optimism, but I only look at results. To me those products have gone downhill and price has gone up.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 11, 2014
  21. bgoodman4

    bgoodman4 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Posts:
    3,237
    Well, only time will tell but it would be a darn shame if things head south for this quite exceptional (so far) bit of code.

    Personally I expect AX64 to remain an excellent program,,,,its probably too simple to mess up unless features are added and we have been told this will not happen. But one of the things that made AX64 so exceptional was its awesome support and that does appear to have slipped.

    Fingers crossed though.
     
  22. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    The price for instant recovery is the same as it was before. That is the only way it can support itself. Whether OA remains standaline will depend on one thing. Market demand.

    As for AX64 and Realcopy, they need to figure out a market that it will sell to or it will go also.
     
  23. Seven64

    Seven64 Guest

    I was referring to FirstDefense (froggy). As I recall after they (Raxico) bought it (kept it as hostage for some marketing scheme) and neutered the software, forget the name they gave it, but was total crap.
    Now they are resurrecting the original FDISR , with a high price tag, and a yearly fee to boot.
    Yeah I know the poor developers need to "feed their families", but they have enough to feed everyone at Wilders! Come on they are millionaires or maybe billionaires , or will soon be, by suckers like us feeding them.:D
     
  24. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590

    That is the problem with these kinds of threads. Mis information. I am not going to take this off topic, other than to say all of what you posted above about the FDISR situation is completely and totally wrong. And I base this on talking with the individuals involved.

    Lets get back on topic. If you want to pursue this further a new thread please.

    Pete
     
  25. Seven64

    Seven64 Guest

    Sounds good to me. :)
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.