Introducing AX64 Time Machine - hybrid imaging/snapshot software

Discussion in 'backup, imaging & disk mgmt' started by Isso, Jan 18, 2013.

  1. Baldrick

    Baldrick Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2002
    Posts:
    2,692
    Location:
    South Wales, UK
    Hi HP or should I say 'Salut'?

    I believe that a future feature request has been made for more selective options as to how many auto backups are to remain unmerged before merging starts, i.e., If set to 10 then when the 11th auto backup is made the 1st one will be merged with the base line, etc.

    You may want to go to over to http://feedback.ax64.com/forums/206143-general and check out/vote for currently suggested enhancements, and even suggest your own recommendations for future enhancements. :D

    That is one of the reasons why AXTM is a great app...and the support provided by Isso and his team is peerless.
     
  2. Baldrick

    Baldrick Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2002
    Posts:
    2,692
    Location:
    South Wales, UK
    Great idea BG.

    And you are correct in terms of how it currently works if you forget to/do not take the recovery CD out of the drive. :oops:
     
  3. bgoodman4

    bgoodman4 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Posts:
    3,237
    I have auto snap active but I also want daily snaps that are not merged. I am accomplishing this for daily incrementals easily from within AX64.

    At the end of each day before I shut down the PC I create a manual snap with the date and time specified in the description. Manual snaps are not merged until you manually delete them from within the AX64 browser so you can keep as many daily (or more if you wish) snaps for as long as you wish. I am keeping daily manuals for a week and then as new (8th day) snaps are created I am deleting the oldest manual snap so I have a rolling 7 day group of daily incrementals..

    I believe this issue will be addressed in the next few months when Isso will be releasing a version of AX64 that allows users to define the number of snaps to be kept (say hourly for 12 hours rather than hourly for 3 hours) as well as to define how and when snaps are merged.
     
  4. bgoodman4

    bgoodman4 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Posts:
    3,237
    Thank you for confirming this, much appreciated.
     
  5. HenriPaul

    HenriPaul Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Posts:
    13
    Location:
    South of France
    Salut les amis !!!
    A real pleasure to be with you !
    Define the number of snaps to be kept would be perfect (for example, 12 rotating backups).
    Thank you to ISSO.
     
  6. Isso

    Isso Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Posts:
    1,450
    Hi merisi,

    Yes, apparently the restore has been completed. However it's unclear to me why the OS didn't reboot afterwards. Bgoodman suggested that the Ax64 Recovery CD was the culprit, however if the system booted into it you would see the AX64 Recovery environment rather than a blank screen. Was it just a black blank screen? Thank you

    Isso
     
  7. Isso

    Isso Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Posts:
    1,450
    Hi Henri-Paul,

    We'll add more flexible backup scheduling in the upcoming release.

    One question - while I perfectly understand the need for real-time versioning, I don't quite understand why do you need Easus for daily incrementals when you can get the same with AX64? Thank you

    Isso
     
  8. Isso

    Isso Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Posts:
    1,450
    Fingol,

    I replied via ticketing system.

    Isso
     
  9. Isso

    Isso Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Posts:
    1,450
    BG,

    I was thinking that a better method would be to have a "Press any key to boot from CD" menu at the boot phase. That way the user can keep the CD in the tray. And I was sure that we included that fix in the latest version, but apparently it doesn't seem work. I already asked the boot media developer to re-check. Thank you

    Isso
     
  10. Isso

    Isso Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Posts:
    1,450
    BG,

    You are absolutely right, that feature is in progress at this moment.

    Isso
     
  11. Isso

    Isso Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Posts:
    1,450
    Baldrick,

    Thank you for compliment to our support, and for mentioning the Ideas section. I often forget about it :D

    Isso
     
  12. Baldrick

    Baldrick Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2002
    Posts:
    2,692
    Location:
    South Wales, UK
    Actually, BG, having thought about it I believe that if the CD drive tray is out (as per what we were suggesting to Isso) and you reboot the tray is automatically pulled in as a part of the reboot...which means it will bootable from during the reboot process (I am not sure that you can configure this not to be the case)...so Isso's approach is probably the better one (once again...:D ).
     
  13. merisi

    merisi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2012
    Posts:
    316
    Isso, everything worked as it's supposed to apart from after the reboot. It went into a black blank screen. I was pretty worried that it was ruined but pleased when it started working again and was back to normal.

    Maybe I should make some changes to my system and then try to restore to again so I can see for definite if changes had taken place. I must admit I'm getting more excited about Ax64 the more I use it.
     
  14. HenriPaul

    HenriPaul Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2013
    Posts:
    13
    Location:
    South of France

    you're right. this is a unnecessary redundancy ! (No doubt a widespread "paranoia") ; D
     
  15. Isso

    Isso Developer

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2009
    Posts:
    1,450
    No, not a paranoia at all, in fact it's always good to have a "backup backup", especially for important data.

    I was just mistakenly thinking that you miss some feature from AX64 that's why you use Easus. Now it's clear to me, thanks!

    Isso
     
  16. twl845

    twl845 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Posts:
    4,186
    Location:
    USA
    Thanks for bringing that to my attention. What about the snapshot that the mentioned snapshot was merged to. Can that one be restored to? What's the point of doing merges except to save space if the merged snapshots aren't any good for restoration? I do manual merges, merging the oldest snapshots. According to what you're saying, I shouldn't merge because merged snapshots can't be restored to. Is that right? I got a feeling I am missing something. :)
     
  17. Baldrick

    Baldrick Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2002
    Posts:
    2,692
    Location:
    South Wales, UK
    Hi twl

    You have missed nothing. The merging is to save space (as you have surmised) and any snapshot can be restored to, whether it is an individual one (auto or manual) or one that has had auto and/or manual snaps merged into it, one or many. I have restored to all of these types in my testing. It is just so flexible...it's brilliant. :cool:
     
  18. twl845

    twl845 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Posts:
    4,186
    Location:
    USA
    OK so as I surmised, the RECEIVING snapshot being merged of a snapshot into it is OK for restoring, but the snapshot that was merged into it no longer exists. Thanks. I understand what BGoodman was saying now.
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2013
  19. bgoodman4

    bgoodman4 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Posts:
    3,237
    That sounds like a good idea,,,,, the new function may work but since I have not had to do a restore from the recovery disk since the last upgrade I was not aware that this had been added. Has anyone else tried it other than merisi?
     
  20. bgoodman4

    bgoodman4 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Posts:
    3,237
    Humm, I am sure that in the past I simply opened the tray and did the reboot, but I could be wrong about this. The memory I have in my head is faulty. Unfortunately I cannot swap it out for new or better RAM.
     
  21. bgoodman4

    bgoodman4 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Posts:
    3,237
    Yup, you got it,,,,, more or less.......I think..... Actually, I believe that the data or system state from the later snap is the data that is available after merging. The data from the earlier/older snap is over written by the new data or system state that existed as of the more recent snap.

    To be absolutely clear here is an example of what I understand the situation to be.

    In snap A there is a file called "example".

    The file is deleted and snap B is created.

    As long as both snaps A and B exist either can be restored to (either system state) or file "example" can be recovered from snap A (it cannot be recovered from snap B as it had been deleted before snap B was created).

    Once the 2 snaps are merged (regardless of which is merged INTO which) you can no longer recover to the system state as of A nor can you recover the file named "example" as snap A no longer exists. You can of course still restore to the later system state (what was formerly snap B) but again, as I said above, you cannot restore to the earlier state (the former snap A).

    As Isso has said new data is (generally) more important then old data. So when snaps are merged what is in effect is happening is that the newer snapshot data/state is overwriting/replacing the older.

    At least thats how I envision it works.
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2013
  22. bgoodman4

    bgoodman4 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2009
    Posts:
    3,237
    Thats great to hear (and not at all unexpected I might add).
     
  23. MarcP

    MarcP Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Posts:
    743
    This point cannot be stressed enough and it is worth repeating regularly! My neighbor recently introduced me to a friend of his who lost everything on the computer because of the visiting grand-son who decided to experiment. He tried to fix it himself and made it worse. An image recovery would've saved everything in minutes and I am not willing to go spend hours trying to recover. I like my time off work.

    I should also emphasize on off-site backup as well. A co-worker of mine lost everything on the computer during the recent Alberta flood. His house was flooded up to 3ft on the main floor for 12 days. His computer was in the basement. Lost all photos, videos, documents, etc. No imaging program can save you if you backup to an external drive sitting next to the machine. That co-worker is devastated. Insurance can't do anything about that. Birth photos of his 3 months old son are gone.

    You can say "that scenario will never apply to me", but those are just examples. Disasters come in all shapes.
     
  24. stapp

    stapp Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Posts:
    27,171
    Location:
    UK
    Had a nice hour or so testing IE11 on Win 7, sandboxed, unsandboxed, Win updates etc etc.

    Then went back the snapshot I took first thing this morning before installing IE11.

    Thanks Isso !!
     
  25. Baldrick

    Baldrick Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2002
    Posts:
    2,692
    Location:
    South Wales, UK
    Indeed...BG...that is not a surprise. We have all had that pleasure as we have discovered the joys of AXTM...;)
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.