Intel takes hands way off approch to Vista.

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by The Hammer, Jun 24, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,683
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2008
  2. Dogbiscuit

    Dogbiscuit Guest

    Another short article, different perspective: Et Tu, Intel?
     
  3. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,041
    apparently intel only started fully adopting to XP in 2006 5 years after release.
    so with windows 7 coming out in the not so distant future makes sence to skip it.
     
  4. jonyjoe81

    jonyjoe81 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2007
    Posts:
    829
    Lot of smart people work at "intel", they know a "duck" when they see one and Vista walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck.

    I notice the only people that never have any problems with Vista are the ones that have 4gb of RAM and dual-cores and a 300 dollar video card.

    Maybe I need to spend 700 dollars to upgrade my computer so It can use a 300 dollar operating system. I'll have to do a cost-analysis.
     
  5. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,089
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Not really, 2GB RAM and a $150 graphics card (as long as its DX10 compliant) will do you fine.....

    But yeah, I agree, Vista is a resource behemoth compared to XP.....
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.