Intel takes hands way off approch to Vista.

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by The Hammer, Jun 24, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,619
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2008
  2. Dogbiscuit

    Dogbiscuit Guest

    Another short article, different perspective: Et Tu, Intel?
     
  3. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,006
    apparently intel only started fully adopting to XP in 2006 5 years after release.
    so with windows 7 coming out in the not so distant future makes sence to skip it.
     
  4. jonyjoe81

    jonyjoe81 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2007
    Posts:
    829
    Lot of smart people work at "intel", they know a "duck" when they see one and Vista walks like a duck and it quacks like a duck.

    I notice the only people that never have any problems with Vista are the ones that have 4gb of RAM and dual-cores and a 300 dollar video card.

    Maybe I need to spend 700 dollars to upgrade my computer so It can use a 300 dollar operating system. I'll have to do a cost-analysis.
     
  5. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    7,927
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Not really, 2GB RAM and a $150 graphics card (as long as its DX10 compliant) will do you fine.....

    But yeah, I agree, Vista is a resource behemoth compared to XP.....
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.