I need replacement for RBRx...SP or Paragon or ATI?

Sorry, but that's not the same. Data must be somewhere else, otherwise I will lose it during reboot and I don't backup my actual system anymore. We both separated system and data, but the rest isn't the same.

 

I know your strategy(at each reboot to replace the windows with an almost clean install) but the way i do work for me and is globally along the same lines in accordance with most users here.

 

after trying the restore feature of SP....i got "failed" message.

and i hate waiting for 20minutes for backup....

i guess i have no choice but go back with RBRx

 

after i created the image,i veriy the image and its says ok.

i restore my saved image at partition D, i selected MBR (don't know if i should select that).....then it says "failed"

 

Where it come from ( C ? ) and where it goes (D?) if you restore to D from C i guess it would'nt work,partition is non bootable.

 

My vote is cast for DriveSnapshot.

Easily the most efficient and trouble-free imaging app i ever seen. Closest to foolproof as any i ever used including my long time rescue line PARAGON.

IMO, with the possible exception of shadowprotect, easily the most reliable of them all, and yes i am biased toward it due to numerous imaging and restoring without so much as a single glitch, and packaged in a tiny compact program.

 

Hi Easter,
the problem is that the user will need to create there own recovery cd to restore system partitions.
the user could create a vistape cd using winbuilder and that would be able to restore system partitions. or build a bartpe cd but that needs a proper windows cd and no oem cut down version.
but my solution below is easier.
thats why image for windows would be a better choice. the image for dos recovery cd is awesome. sure you have to get used to it but once you have its the best. almost instant start and has no problem detecting hardware.