How good is Wokhan Windows Firewall Notifier?

Discussion in 'other firewalls' started by ocsi, May 18, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ocsi

    ocsi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Posts:
    95
    How good is Wokhan Windows Firewall Notifier? It is enough for a decent protection. I mention that I use Wireless Router Firewall.
    (Win 7 Ultimate X64)
     
  2. pegr

    pegr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,279
    Location:
    UK
    My understanding is that WFN is a Windows 7 Firewall extender to allow popups to be displayed when outgoing connections are blocked by the Windows 7 Firewall. Any rules created are Windows 7 Firewall rules, maintained within the Windows 7 Firewall itself.

    WFN is not even running in the background and using any resources most of the time as it only gets launched by a scheduled task whenever a blocked outgoing connection event is written to the Windows event log by the Windows 7 Firewall.

    The purpose of WFN is to make it easier to use the Windows 7 Firewall as a two-way firewall. The question you are really asking therefore is whether the Windows 7 Firewall itself, in conjunction with a router, is sufficient for decent protection. I would say yes but it is something you will need to decide for yourself.
     
    Last edited: May 18, 2012
  3. ocsi

    ocsi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Posts:
    95
    OK.Thanks for the reply.
     
  4. alexandrud

    alexandrud Developer

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2011
    Posts:
    1,230
    Location:
    Romania
    WFN is not running indeed until an interesting event is read from Event Log. Instead of it, is running schtasks.exe which monitorize the Event Log changes. So, a program is running to maintain the observation of Event Log.
     
  5. pegr

    pegr Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2008
    Posts:
    2,279
    Location:
    UK
    Yes, that's what I was trying to say. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
     
  6. garry35

    garry35 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Posts:
    329
    i tested briefly but it asked for permission for every webpage so never got much further as it seemed like too much hassle
     
  7. itman

    itman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Posts:
    2,969
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    I used it off and on for over a year.

    At first glance, it appears to be the "missing link" to the Vista/WIN 7 firewall that will create outbound rules without going through the "pain." Its main feature is the ability to create rules for specific svchost.exe services; something no one other than the native Vista/WIN 7 firewall can do.

    However, it is buggy due to the fact it was created by a single developer with limited resources. I also observed it doing a bit more than just being a front end to the Vista/WIN 7 firewall.

    Got rid of it and haven't looked back since.
     
  8. Unity

    Unity Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Posts:
    112
    Location:
    Toulouse ~ France
    I m using it since last year.

    I've made a few bug reports to the developper and he was really quick to answer them.

    Last version is working perfectly fine here.

    I really like the idea and it is of course lighter than everything else.

    edit : btw there is an ongoing thread here : https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=307871
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.