How does kaspersky compare to Comodo and Bit Defender - for CPU/RAM and intrusion?

Discussion in 'other firewalls' started by google88, Feb 7, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. google88

    google88 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2009
    Posts:
    135
    I am using Kaspersky

    have for years

    had bad experiences with:
    Norton - just not working to protect me
    McAfee - bonkers pop ups and 1000s of duplicate emails

    so they are off the table :)

    lately Kaspersky is stopping websites and slowing the computer down to a halt, some other users have had the same problems. (and Also Kaspersky stealth uninstals and crashed MBAM.)


    ---

    I use my PC XP for music
    so the CPU and RAM is max most times!


    I think i am looking for an alternative to Kaspersky that has:

    - Low CPU and Ram footprint - not using valuable system resources
    - protects me very well
    - NOT intrusive

    NOT intrusive =
    ie
    - makes intelligent decisions for me
    - easy to find options
    - no pop ups asking me gobbledegook stuff when i am writing music
    - no stopping stuff work
    - plays nice with backup software (Macrium Reflect) and MBAM (i have to exceptions to Kaspersky for these 2 programs)


    so how Does Comodo and Bit Defender compare to Kasperky on these fronts?

    or are there other options o_O

    or stick with Kasperky

    Cheers

    :ninja:
     
  2. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,779
    Location:
    Texas
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.