HideMyA**: Online Anonymous Web Proxy Service

http://hidemyass.com/

Crude name, but pretty good free service.

They offer a CGI-Proxy service, where you surf anonymously, proxy lists, and an online proxy checker.

 

Nice find Kye-U ... Thanks

 

Already been posted about back in November 2005. https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=107071

 

It's good for what it does but it's just a basic CGI proxy. You can get one of those put on your own server in about 60 seconds if you have a web host. You can get CGIProxy here:
http://www.jmarshall.com/tools/cgiproxy/
Open source and quite fast. Here's what it looks like...
http://img485.imageshack.us/img485/7521/cgi4uu.jpg

 

lets see. hidemyass! in testing.

WHAT!

"In order to accept POST request originating from this domain, the admin must add this domain to the whitelist."

meh.. proxys are lame.

 

OKAY, some proxys are lame.. but ieproxy and hidemyass seem nice.

 

Oh joy, a proxy service offering anonymity which includes a web-bug tracker on their page (not to mention adverts courtesy of Google Syndication). Thank goodness for Proxomitron...

 

http://www.download.com/b.gif
they dont seem to filter out everything

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/2555/untitled7vo.gif

 

I tried it back in November 2005 when it was first posted. Earlier on today i got the same results as before. I can get to the website, but it doesn't work for me using IE anyway ? Maybe it needs scripting enabled or something like that. I didn't bother to try !

One of my security Apps alerts me to these.

2 Web Bugs killed by Desktop Armor.

Details

http://t1.extreme-dm.com/I.GIF

http://e0.extreme-dm.com",/


StevieO

 

I just grab the proxy details ... and manually configure them - when/if needed/desired.

 

i use adblock and a webbug filterset to block those. webbugs are very common just as common as ads.

 

It nevertheless indicates that user privacy is not the operators' top priority - an undesireable attitude for a service which will have access to records of your online activities.

 

It nevertheless indicates that user privacy is not the operators' top priority - an undesireable attitude for a service which will have access to records of your online activities.

especially major corporation websites. e.g. buy.com , target.com, macromedia.com, msn.com, download.com.. just to name a few.

 

They aren't going to have access to every URL you visit - an anonymiser service is. Therefore its attitude to privacy is more important and should merit closer examination. As with services generally, there are a number of players who will "promise the moon and deliver a crater" and there certainly seem to be a few rogue anonymity services about.

Unfortunately the greatest test of such services happens out of public view (via secret court orders) and it is only in exceptional cases that the public gets to find out (as with the JAP developers making the backdoor they were required to install as obvious as possible).

 

Using a blocker that prevents government servers.........an the website mention herein this thread.........is blocked!!!! Wonder why.

 

Excuse me...just noticed that the spyware blocker is also enabled.......either way....something is not right with that website

 

explian ur self snowie.. one word at a time