Google Chrome extensions

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by Saraceno, Jan 17, 2010.

  1. IvoShoen

    IvoShoen Registered Member

  2. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

  3. Dragon1952

    Dragon1952 Registered Member

    That extension makes a big difference and i would not want to be without it. It should have millions of users instead of only 36k. I have mine set in options at 96.
     
  4. digmor crusher

    digmor crusher Registered Member

    Yup, works really well here too, thanks for the tip.
     
  5. Iangh

    Iangh Registered Member

  6. Trooper

    Trooper Registered Member

    I found it to not make any difference at all. Uninstalled it.
     
  7. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Agree with that. I could not distinguish between the Before/After on the Overview page. I try hard to keep my extension count to a minimum, so Font Rendering Enhancer didn't make the cut.
     
  8. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    Did you refresh the page? A page refresh is needed to see the extension do its job.
     
  9. anon

    anon Registered Member

  10. Page42

    Page42 Registered Member

    Went back and refreshed per your advice and it made no difference. TY
     
  11. mrpink

    mrpink Registered Member

  12. Krusty

    Krusty Registered Member

    You know you don't need a separate extension for "I don't care about cookies"? You can add the same list into uBO.
     
  13. mrpink

    mrpink Registered Member

    I didn't add it to ublock because it says it's not as effective as the extension
     
  14. bjm_

    bjm_ Registered Member

    Font Width 100
    png_4600.png
    Font Width 0
    png_4601.png
     
  15. 142395

    142395 Guest

    I don't care fonts, but surprised to find that font-smooth property is not available on any browser on Windows. So if the extension is meant to complement that, you won't see difference in other platform. Note font rendering can vary on OS, browser, and actual fonts on each pages. IDK how it works, but I found there are many hacks to achieve similar effect - if what the extension do is only (any combination of) these tricks there'll be no need for it, you can use Stylus or even uBO or AdGuard tho universally apply CSS rules on the latter is not directly possible. Just for curiosity I tested one of the hacks w/ uBO rule on the latest Brave on Win10 for Google search (I just copy-pasted that 0.2px value, but others claim different values. There seems to be many more hacks but I have no interest in testing them all):
    Code:
    google.*##body:style(-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0.2px !important)
    https://i.imgur.com/pgKYrYi.png
    https://i.imgur.com/R9mzCm1.png
     
  16. 142395

    142395 Guest

    That means they haven't spent the same level of effort for the filter as the extension, for uBO or AG or even ABP have all the necessary function to remove virtually any cookie warnings. Having compared the filter w/ Fanboy and AG Annoyances filters, I'd say the filter is more likely to cause FPs than at least AG Annoyances. I personally only use my own filters for cookie consents but I guess for most ppl AG Annoyances alone will be enough - if it's not just use the element picker.
     
  17. Trooper

    Trooper Registered Member

    That's telling right there.
     
  18. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

    It's so weird that this problem has never been fixed on Chromium based browsers, Google should be ashamed. This extension seems to work on some sites, but not on all, that's the downside. For example, I don't see any difference on Yahoo Finance, fonts look a bit blurry. No problem on Firefox.
     
  19. guest

    guest Guest

    Google’s new extension lets you easily create deep links to web page text fragments
    June 17, 2020
    https://mspoweruser.com/googles-new...create-deep-links-to-web-page-text-fragments/
    Boldly link where no one has linked before: Text Fragments
     
  20. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

  21. Dragon1952

    Dragon1952 Registered Member

  22. Spartan

    Spartan Registered Member

  23. Brummelchen

    Brummelchen Registered Member

  24. Dragon1952

    Dragon1952 Registered Member

  25. Rasheed187

    Rasheed187 Registered Member

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice