Glitch in rule display

Discussion in 'ESET Smart Security v3 Beta Forum' started by CyGho, Nov 2, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CyGho

    CyGho Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2004
    Posts:
    35
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Hi there,

    Testing the RC1 of ESS 3.0.414.0. I noticed a little display glitch. Maybe it's allready solved in the final but anyway.

    As you can see in the first screenshot the word "port" is missing in the line with remote side info.
    http://img32.picoodle.com/img/img32/6/11/2/cygho/f_essnotdisplm_6f084a5.gif


    In the "edit rule" dialog kind of the same glitch, see the second screenshot.
    http://img31.picoodle.com/img/img31/6/11/2/cygho/f_essnotdisplm_5d38801.gif

    Tried to repport it to betasupport[at]eset.com but the mail is rejected: "User unknown in local recipient table"

    Anyone noticed this?
     
  2. andy2008

    andy2008 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2007
    Posts:
    33
    If nothing is defined for the remote side it will say "for every"

    Just try editing the rule (expand + symbol, highlight rule, click edit, choose remote tab at the tope) and you will see if you add a port or I.P. the description changes.
     
  3. CyGho

    CyGho Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2004
    Posts:
    35
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    Yes when i define a port, the word "port" is displayed. Noticed that allready offcourse when difining finer rules.
    But this "problem" doesn't occur in the local part (and no port difined), just with remote.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.