Future Changes to EAV

Discussion in 'ESET NOD32 Antivirus' started by Blackspear, Jan 20, 2008.

  1. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,429
    I Hope Not, since that would destroy the whole ESET brand as we know it today.
     
  2. jimwillsher

    jimwillsher Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Posts:
    667
    Mind you, the "32" bit in the name is starting to make it sound dated....



    Jim
     
  3. agoretsky

    agoretsky Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Posts:
    4,034
    Location:
    California
    Hello,

    ESET does offer the ESET Online Scanner, which is a free service to scan a PC for malicious software.

    Regards,

    Aryeh Goretsky

     
  4. yongsua

    yongsua Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Posts:
    474
    Location:
    Malaysia
    I meant free protection.:D Is that possible?
     
  5. SmackyTheFrog

    SmackyTheFrog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Posts:
    767
    Location:
    Lansing, Michigan
    Businesses tend to want to make a profit off the products and services they offer. Go figure.
     
  6. firzen771

    firzen771 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Posts:
    4,815
    Location:
    Canada
    ye cuz the person who suggested it was expecting ESET to turn into a non profit organization by creating a free product:rolleyes: last i checked avast, avira, and the rest are still for profit so thats not very good reasoning.
     
  7. duijv023

    duijv023 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Posts:
    230
    Location:
    Rijnsburg, Netherlands
    Marketing will absolutely not agree onthis, but please: change the name!
    NOD32 refers to light-use of resources, while detecting 95% new malware.
    Unfortunately, this is not the case anymore.
    Therefor, I prefer EAV 5.0 as the new name.

    Technically that means that i want old days to return, but that's said very easily. With the current complex and sophisticated malware, you cannot deal with those when using v2 similar software. Lots of extra wishes make software programs bigger and bigger. Time for complete redesigno_O

    List of priorities for new versions in my opninion:
    - make EAV5 a very stable platform (especially on Win 2008 family servers!!)
    - raise detection levels (is it possible to reach "old" detection rates again without FP of coarse)
    - please get rid of startup scans, they are very annoying
    - check more applications fon newer versions (almost every PC has adobe reader, adobe flash, and Java); users ignore software updates too often. Perhaps one shoud even think of skype

    Greetings from Holland
     
  8. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,429
    Are you joking? They are far from annoying.:isay:

    So you mean that you don't have time to wait 20 Sec until the scan is done?


    And a tip (but not recommended).
    If you don't like them just un-check the start-up scans in the scheduler!!!
     
  9. SmackyTheFrog

    SmackyTheFrog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Posts:
    767
    Location:
    Lansing, Michigan
    Startup scans are the single most effective way of catching an infection that is already resident when a new signature set is loaded. It really isn't a good idea to turn them off.
     
  10. duijv023

    duijv023 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Posts:
    230
    Location:
    Rijnsburg, Netherlands

    let me say it in a different way:
    Yes i know the purpose of these scans, and yes: it is better for security.
    No, most office users do not want to wait for their PC to be available again.
    No, sometimes it is certainly not 20 secs, but a few minutes

    But perhaps these scans can be executed in the background with even less usage of resources (why hurry these scans?).
    On older Win XP machines the scans take (even configured as "only when idle") too much time. Sometimes during the scan one hardly can work. I see this on a lot of older PC's. In most cases intel 865 and 955 chipsets withe the right compatible Pentium 4 ht processors with 256 or 512 Mb RAM.

    I hope this clears misunderstandings.

    Greetings from Holland
     
  11. SmackyTheFrog

    SmackyTheFrog Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Posts:
    767
    Location:
    Lansing, Michigan
    The scan priority is already set to "lowest" for the default scan tasks. This means that any normal user process requests for CPU or disk resources will get prioritized above it. It will still consume more memory during this process and (probably more importantly) increase disk latency which is typically the most dramatic effect users would feel on performance. If you're dealing with hardware that old and slow then you might want to consider changing the priority so it only runs when idle.

    But unfortunately, 256/512mb of memory simply is not enough memory for even an XP install running recent software. Frameworks like .NET have increased the memory footprint of applications because lets face it, it is cheap these days and you typically don't see less than 2gb on anything but netbooks. No AV product these days is going to provide good protection without incurring a noticeable performance hit on systems that underspeced. Heck, my 2 year old phone has more processing power than that.
     
  12. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,603
    Location:
    Outer space
    - Option to set Heuristic sensitivity to High for advanced users to trade a few FP's for better detection.
    - Option in the firewall to allow processes based on services. For example not svchost.exe on that and that port. But that you can say, allow svchost.exe only for windows time and windows update and block all other svchost.exe requests
    - When creating a SysRescue disk, include the current virus database in the image so that it is possible to use SysRescue on a PC without a wired or compatible wireless internet connection.
    - Add option in exclusion to exlude files accessed by a specific process, for example mbam.exe so Eset doesn't scan all files mbam accesses when doing a full scan.
     
  13. dmaasland

    dmaasland Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2010
    Posts:
    468
    Holy crosspost batman :)

    ___________________


    This is already possible
     
  14. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,603
    Location:
    Outer space
    To clarify, I really mean sensitivity, so no deeper scanning or Advanced Heuristics, but lowering the threshold that is needed before a file is flagged by Heuristics.
     
  15. yongsua

    yongsua Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Posts:
    474
    Location:
    Malaysia
    I hope that ESET will include a new feature "Auto Update Cache Cleaning" in its products so that users don't need to deal with some of their update issues anymore.
     
  16. happycamperz

    happycamperz Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Posts:
    1
    1. Would like the ability to set the exact day & time for a monthly scan. Right now, all you can do is set how many minutes in between intervals.
     
  17. webyourbusiness

    webyourbusiness Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2004
    Posts:
    2,662
    Location:
    Throughout the USA and Canada
    you can do this already using the scheduler for weekly - is there a reason you only want to scan the computer once a month?
     
  18. yongsua

    yongsua Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Posts:
    474
    Location:
    Malaysia
    I am suggesting that ESET includes a update parameter for defition update.
     
  19. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,429
    It already has one, but it only shows when the update is done (really quick) :)

    But I agree with you it should follow the update from start to finish :thumb:
     
  20. yongsua

    yongsua Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Posts:
    474
    Location:
    Malaysia
    sorry,I meant an internet connection parameter so that I can set its parameter to dial-up connection and it is convenient for those users with dial-up connection because those users don't need to manually update.I found that ESET always trying to connect to its server before the system start up completely and always get the error message "could not be updated",Besides,I really need it now.See my post here:https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=296851
    My situation is same as dial-up connection now.Did you misunderstand it?
     
  21. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,603
    Location:
    Outer space
    Because lots of users come here with an infection that Eset couldn't automatically remove, but a removal tool from Eset can, I think it's a good idea to integrate them, like Norton 2012 for example:
    This would lighten the number of users in need of support and like the quote says also improve security for unaware users.
     
  22. sweater

    sweater Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Posts:
    1,678
    Location:
    Philippines, the Political Dynasty Capital of the
    Yeah you're right!!! :thumb:

    NOD32 should put everything useful in the program. Integrate it and let users decides what to enable/disable, use/not to use, whatever ...etc...:cool:
     
  23. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,429
    Sounds great :thumb:
     
  24. Matthijs5nl

    Matthijs5nl Guest

    I like the idea, but I think the best solution is to integrate all those standalone malware removal tools in a emergency rescue kit. And then link to that in the Tools menu of ESET generation 5, just like they did with SysInspector and SysRescue (see https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=294574 the last screenshot in the first post).
    They could name it SysClean or SysEmergency or whatever.
     
  25. SweX

    SweX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2007
    Posts:
    6,429
    Or like that, not sure wich way out of these two that is the best though.
    But both ways are much better than stand-alone tools for sure.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.