Found Security Compromise in Sandboxie

Discussion in 'privacy technology' started by tonyseeking, Feb 1, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. tonyseeking

    tonyseeking Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Posts:
    406
    Peter. Listen carefully to what I say.... This is not operator error, it's a genuine privacy breach in Sandboxie. All I did was save an mpeg WHILST USING SANDBOXIE, and when I cleaned out Sandboxie, I learned that Sandboxie had allowed data to be written OUTSIDE the Sandbox, proving Sandbox is flawed and not doing what it claims.
     
  2. tonyseeking

    tonyseeking Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Posts:
    406
    Pete, I am wondering about you. Why is your head in the sandbox? (excuse the pun).

    It seems you are so loyal to Sandbox and so scared of any privacy or security breaches that you are not willing to open minded and without bias look at the evidence of a privacy breach found in Sandboxie.

    I stated in the other message exactly what I did, and it's normal user behaviour of saving a file, and Sandbox FAILED by writing data OUTSIDE of the Sandbox and OUTSIDE of the initial saved location of the mpeg.

    And what's more disturbing is... that the saved window was ALSO SANDBOXED, yet it still wrote data OUTSIDE the Sandbox.

    This is a genuine privacy breach that I have found, and you would be wise to take it serious.
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2009
  3. tonyseeking

    tonyseeking Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Posts:
    406
    Exactly! :thumb:

    And I have proven that the claim "Enhanced Privacy: Browsing history, cookies, and cached temporary files collected while Web browsing stay in the sandbox and don't leak into Windows. is VERY MISLEADING AND FALSE!

    Who exactly do I report this to? And what is their email? Who is the author of Sandboxie?
     
  4. tonyseeking

    tonyseeking Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Posts:
    406
    I configured Sandboxie to place a red border around all Sandbox windows.

    And the website where I downloaded the mpeg file was Sandboxed, and amazingly, even the download window was also Sandboxed and had a big red border around it. HOWEVER, there was still information saved OUTSIDE the Sandbox. :thumbd:

    That is very misleading when Sandbox shows even the download window as being Sandboxed, yet then allows data to be written to C:\Users\Tony\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Windows\Recent\
     
  5. Gizzy

    Gizzy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Posts:
    149
    Location:
    NJ, USA
    Thats because you took the file out of the sandbox,

    If you keep the file in the sandbox and don't recover it to the desktop then this wouldn't happen,

    Once the file is taken out of the sandbox then sandboxie has no control over it.
     
  6. tonyseeking

    tonyseeking Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Posts:
    406
    The problem is that Sandboxie allowed writing to C:\Users\Tony\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Windows\Recent\

    I used Sandboxie, and saved a file to Desktop. Hence, there should only be 2 places data was written, inside Sandbox and a single file to Desktop.

    However, in the background, without my knowledge, there was data written to C:\Users\Tony\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Windows\Recent\

    And if it wasn't for Ccleaner, I would never have known that my Sandbox session had allowed my personal filename to be written OUTSIDE desktop and Sandbox for all the world to see.

    There is no escaping this... I have found a legitimate Sandbox privacy breach.
     
  7. ambient_88

    ambient_88 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Posts:
    854
    That is what I said; I don't know why he keeps on complaining about this supposed sandbox leak.
     
  8. tonyseeking

    tonyseeking Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Posts:
    406
    It is inaccurate, because 100% everything I did to save that file to my Desktop was done using Sandbox. No other program was used, I was fully using Sandbox, and the save file box even belongs to Sandboxie.

    So hence, it's a Sandbox issue and they are making false and misleading claims on their website, as I have proven.
     
  9. tonyseeking

    tonyseeking Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Posts:
    406
    You are DEAD WRONG!!! Sandboxie passed permission to windows to write OUTSIDE the sandbox, which is a mistake and privacy flaw.

    I saved the mpeg file USING SANDBOXIE save windows etc. So it's an Sandbox issue and proves it is allowing writing some data OUTSIDE of the Sandbox when it shouldn't.
     
  10. dw426

    dw426 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Posts:
    5,543
    Not even. NOTHING, and I mean it, NOTHING is foolproof/leakproof. There never has been, and there never will be. If anyone wants to keep dreaming, that's their right to do so, but for those of us who want to be sensible, there should always be a "what if?" in our minds. That does not mean you have to be paranoid and afraid there are black helicopters hovering high above your house, but even a half percent chance of something going wrong is still a chance.
     
  11. dw426

    dw426 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Posts:
    5,543
    Funny how you're not over at SandboxIEs' forums, throwing as much of a fit as you are here. I've tried everything I can to repeat your problem on my machine and I simply cannot do it. If you're expecting SandboxIE to be 100% flawless, stop using it and every other bit of software you have, and throw your system in the nearest river, because it's not going to happen. Did you ever stop to think that maybe there is a "Recent" entry in that folder because *gasp*! a "recent" file was "recently" added to your desktop? Once you recover that file from the sandbox, Windows goes on writing down everything you do like it always has.

    And again, if this is such a big problem, why the hell aren't you at the forums over there causing as much ruckus as you can?

    Edit: This is a waste of time, until he goes over to their forum and complains, this means nada, ziltch.
     
  12. philby

    philby Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Posts:
    944
    You recovered the file, so you passed permission to windows to write outside the sandbox.

    Surely?

    philby
     
  13. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA

    The sky is falling!!! The sky is falling!!!! Lol:isay:

    Just who the hell said Sandboxie cures all. Wait a minute, I must have missed that post. Because if true, there isnt a reason for any other vendor to show up here, ever, ever again.

    The almighty Sandboxie missed something. Sorry to be dramatic, but whats the problem. Is that any different then a AV missing a piece of malware? Same outcome. I really dont even see the purpose of this thread.

    That ul do pig, that ul do.:D
     
  14. tonyseeking

    tonyseeking Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Posts:
    406
    That's because you have no idea where to look afterwards. Believe me, you have traces on your hard drive if you saved any files, and these traces are OUTSIDE the Sandbox.

    If you freely choose to ignore this fact, then that is your choice :)
     
  15. dw426

    dw426 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Posts:
    5,543
    Well, see, that's the issue, DID it miss anything? If the file was recovered before this "problem" occurred, then this whole thing is dead in the water, done, stick a fork in it. And I still an anxious to hear why there is nowhere on Tzuks' forum where this problem has been posted by the OP.
     
  16. tonyseeking

    tonyseeking Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Posts:
    406
    No. Because I saved the file using Sandboxie' own save window, which said is sandboxed too, which is obviously isn't. And I saved a file on Desktop, and I never saved data anywhere else, so Sandbox should not have written the data elsewhere. :thumbd:
     
  17. dw426

    dw426 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Posts:
    5,543
    Thanks for informing me of my own education, lol. For YOUR education, I've been repeating downloads within the sandbox for the last 30 minutes, and, if I DON"T recover them, guess what? There's NOTHING. Furthermore, and AGAIN, why are you not posting this over at SandboxIE's forums? The longer you wait to do that, the more foolish you look in my eyes.
     
  18. tonyseeking

    tonyseeking Former Poster

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2008
    Posts:
    406
    What's the URL?
     
  19. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
    Tzuk, might be sleeping. Come on folks, if this is true, and it may be, what do you think he will do? He will make it right as he always does.

    You can slam the product, but dont slam the inventer.:shifty:

    Ilya, Tzuk, Marcos, Eirik, Joe, Stefan, and on, and on, and on, and on.
     
  20. philby

    philby Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Posts:
    944
  21. trjam

    trjam Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Posts:
    9,102
    Location:
    North Carolina USA
  22. dw426

    dw426 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Posts:
    5,543
  23. Rmus

    Rmus Exploit Analyst

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2005
    Posts:
    4,020
    Location:
    California
    Can you open to the Properties of that .lnk and post what is in the target line?

    ----
    rich
     
  24. dw426

    dw426 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Posts:
    5,543
    We'll certainly see, and I'll be watching sandboxIEs' forums to watch the status. I still think this is simply a case of a file being removed from the sandbox and Windows doing its thing.
     
  25. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Not true, simply not true. If you don't recover the file from the sandbox, and delete the sandbox you won't find that lnk file. Once you recover the file, you have removed it from the sandbox. Pure and simple, and the mere act of putting it on the real system desktop creates registry entries and short cuts. The problem isn't sandboxie it's user error. If you don't want traces outside the sandbox, then don't remove it from the sandbox. DUH.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.