What do you see in the file-properties of RCC.exe after you have signed it. Do you see a valid signature, or is it not valid?
I don't see RCC.exe signed too, so the message "no signature found on the file" from Foltyn SecurityShield is correct.
FWIW I downloaded RCC.exe (v1.69.012) on December 6 and it wasn't signed ever since. Btw, FSS does not flag it and let it run freely. Strange cause FSS is supposed to monitor unsigned files, isn't it?
@ Mister X Thanks, but what I meant is that the link has been removed, and now all of a sudden you can upload apps for analysis in a sandbox? I hope they will continue to develop this app, because it does look promising. Or perhaps they took my advice and made a deal with the guys from SpyShelter.
Can't turn off protection. When I click on the link "turn off" nothing happens and the program keeps logging/monitoring processes. Is this program under a closed beta? I look very silent this thread.
That's pitiful. It says that there first offering was basically bad. Why was it offered. Going to be hard to take them seriously
I think its good, they have realised probably via comments made here at wilders that it was flawed and have decided to rethink its code and methodology...Its shows that they are open to suggestions unlike so many developers.
I will give them the benefit of the dought here. if they don't disappear like returnil did without any notice I will accept their offer.
Well, it did get a 100% score, it managed to stop 28 ransomware variants, but I'm not sure if it relied on the user to make the block decision. So I don't think the product was bad, but they probably felt like it might generate too many false positives. But I have no clue what they mean with "application white-listing", that doesn't sound really pro-active to me.
..."based on application white-listing" Whitelisted apps can run and non whitelisted apps are blocked, or something like that. So it's like an AE. But we'll see in the next weeks what they have to offer (Dec 2016/Jan 2017)
Yes I understand, but it sounds very basic to me. Anyone can build such an app, they can make a list of trusted publishers (see link), if you're not on the list you can't run. This is what I call "baby-sitting" apps. I don't need an app for that, I can do that myself, by simply downloading apps that are listed on trusted sites. I'm more interested in behavioral monitoring. http://whitelist.kaspersky.com/catalogue
BTW, did you test it against ransomware, and if not, can you do so? I wonder if you get better results than with RansomFree.
It's supposed to alert you about ransomware related activity. So did you try your ransomware samples, and what happened?
Well...I have a proof it worked (in a way).A (good) game with unusual installer (pointed by many GOG-users).A lots of quick-saves worked just fine,and after 3,5 hours wanted to make one "full" save,and quit gaming.No luck - game crashed to desktop.After that - every other quick/full save attempt had the same (crashing to desktop) result.I suspected bugs,uninstalled it and waited for patches...never thaught FSS was to blame.There was no warning at all.