Flock, RIP?

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by vasa1, Apr 12, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. vasa1

    vasa1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Posts:
    4,152
  2. Daveski17

    Daveski17 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Posts:
    8,028
    Location:
    Lloegyr
    Good riddance I say! It was rubbish anyway. All it did was crash when I first had a look at it (Gecko engine) & I wasn't over impressed with the WebKit version. Oddly, I found a Flock plug-ins folder on my laptop C-drive yesterday. I don't know why it hadn't deleted when I uninstalled it.
     
  3. dw426

    dw426 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Posts:
    5,543
    There just was no need for it. Hell, if I had accounts with them, I can basically log into Facebook and Twitter from just about any website I go to anymore. Of course there were the security implications as well, but screw that if I can take part in the "cool crowd", right? :rolleyes: The only Flock there should be is Flock of Seagulls.
     
  4. Daveski17

    Daveski17 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Posts:
    8,028
    Location:
    Lloegyr
    You're not flocking wrong ... :D ;)
     
  5. doktornotor

    doktornotor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2008
    Posts:
    2,047
    :thumb: Never got the idea behind this one...
     
  6. Daveski17

    Daveski17 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Posts:
    8,028
    Location:
    Lloegyr
    Not only that, but it (Gecko engined Flock) was inherently unstable on my laptop. SeaMonkey, Firefox & K-Meleon have all worked fine.
     
  7. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    8,516
    I wouldn't mind if RockMelt discontinues either.
     
  8. dw426

    dw426 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Posts:
    5,543
    If Flock couldn't spread it wings and fly, Rock won't get past being a pebble. Silly as it may sound when discussing the crazed social crowd, I doubt too many of them want social integration to go as far as these two browsers have. It's one thing to be able to "Like" a page just by clicking on an embedded button, or signing in from another website. It's quite another to have your contacts taking up one side of your browser and the other social features taking up half of the rest. Surely even the hardcores want to see as much screen space as they can. After all, that itself is a new craze, less browser more webpage.
     
  9. PJC

    PJC Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Posts:
    2,959
    Location:
    Internet
    Never liked it...
     
  10. vasa1

    vasa1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Posts:
    4,152
  11. Daveski17

    Daveski17 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Posts:
    8,028
    Location:
    Lloegyr
    "Raise a bunch of capital in order to hire old people for pennies on the dollar. Use this vast, untapped resource in order to 'develop' a browser that consists of an amalgamation of buzzwords (and other useless garbage) and code stolen from pre-existing projects. Shortly after the product comes out of 'stealth-mode', appear at many different conventions in order to hype it even further and then wait for a fool with a hundred million dollars to buy us out."


    LOL! :D
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.