Firewall Test

Discussion in 'LnS English Forum' started by jordi.c, Apr 8, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jordi.c

    jordi.c Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Posts:
    36
    Since yesterday I'm using Look 'n' stop.

    I have to give full credits to the maker of this program it is the Utorrent under the Firewallls :).

    The rules/filters are a bit difficult to setup for a leak.

    I read the matousec test results and I couldn't believe look n stop was so low even not recommended. Matousec test are valuable by a lot of people who are in the firewall field.

    Link to the actual test page.

    http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w199/jordicc/8-4-200913-11-52.png
     
  2. 1hui

    1hui Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2007
    Posts:
    54
    LnS is a single-minded firewall,a very good firewall .

    You can chose a HIPS(like ssm) to work with lns:)
     
  3. cruelsister

    cruelsister Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2007
    Posts:
    1,424
    Location:
    Paris
    Agreed- I use LNS as a FIREWALL and not an AV, anti-trojan, HIPS, etc.
     
  4. mikelp

    mikelp Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Posts:
    13
    You should be ok if you are careful. I've been fine using just the Vista firewall and Windows defender and Kaspersky antivirus for the last year, no problems at all. I use Firefox with a few good addons. I only decided to switch to LnS because I want more control and a good log but I love it it's very fun to use. Plus I was looking for a different antivirus with a good replacement for Windows defender. But that's only personal, never worried about leak tests because I avoid P2P, p*rn or anything that might be iffy. I like my computer clean and fast.
     
  5. cruelsister

    cruelsister Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2007
    Posts:
    1,424
    Location:
    Paris
    Avoiding P2P, porn sites, etc isn't good enough anymore with the amount of legit sites being hijacked. It was just a few weeks ago that Kaspersky's site was compromised and serving up malware links.
     
  6. mikelp

    mikelp Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Posts:
    13
    FUD doesn't work on me.
     
  7. Toby75

    Toby75 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Posts:
    480
    I don't get it. They label it as good protection but don't recommend it? Does this make sense? Maybe I'm missing something. I don't use LnS but I hear nothing but good things about it.

    Toby
     
  8. Fad

    Fad Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Posts:
    424
    Location:
    England
    As far as I can tell, the matousec site believes a "firewall" should have HIPS capabilities, and they test accordingly.

    If a firewall fails a HIPS component test it automatically gets a 0% score for that part of the test, so the overall score is reduced, even though the firewall does NOT have a HIPS component !

    As people have said above, LnS is a firewall.... not a HIPS program.

    I think that`s what it`s all about :doubt:

    (and you can spend all day reading about what people think of those tests)
     
  9. shaunwang

    shaunwang Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Posts:
    94
    I also seriously think that hips should not be linked with a firewall... They cannot be blend together.

    Firewall that is pure is like looknstop and chx-i

    Hybrid that mix firewall + hips together can become unstable unless the developer knows how to balance adaption to user environment.

    Looknstop is definitely one good solid firewall, rule-based driver driven thatat its best hope to see more cool features in the future
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.