February On-Demand Predictions

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by MalwareDie, Dec 21, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MalwareDie

    MalwareDie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Posts:
    500
    that is a scary thought. makes me think that half of ones tested will fail.
     
  2. NAMOR

    NAMOR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Posts:
    1,530
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    such a tease. :p
     
  3. MalwareDie

    MalwareDie Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2006
    Posts:
    500
    I don't think hes joking. if it really does happen i guess there will be lots of signature adding after the test.
     
  4. FRug

    FRug Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    Posts:
    309
    If so many samples have been added, there's also a bigger likelyhood that new corrupted samples have been added. During the last months there have been a few waves of corrupting malware as well as mass-spamming with corrupted samples. It will be a lot of work to sieve them out. Also there were quite a few new polymorphic worms, which hopefully did not end up in the normal set as standard files, but should go into the polymorphic set. One undetected poly worm variant can mean tens of thousands of missed samples in the standard set which could severely skew the statistics.

    Looking forward to seeing the results anyway :)
     
  5. Stefan Kurtzhals

    Stefan Kurtzhals AV Expert

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2003
    Posts:
    702
    Yeah, I remember well those waves of Backdoor-CEP.svr junk on VT. Those samples were patched beyond any functionality. But still, some certain AV caught most of them just because they made a very silly detection based on the file size of the malware. :rolleyes: IBK, I hope you didn't add these crap files to your collection.
     
  6. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    You have read my mind :eek:
    I was thinking in corrupted samples too. Although, with the recent trends on malware writing, is not unlikely that many AVs begin to miss more samples than expected.
    IBK, it seems that you need more help/money/time to manage the test bed?
     
  7. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    yes, that might be a problem. I've noticed those samples too, but I'm sure IBK has good ways of selecting the samples. :) He's online now as I see and perhaps he can answer. :D

    btw, I trully hope AVs will add undetected working samples after the test, not expecting the next one to come to add them... :cautious:
     
  8. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    like you say ;)
     
  9. Sjoeii

    Sjoeii Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Posts:
    1,240
    Location:
    52?18'51.59"N + 4?56'32.13"O
    AV Comparatives Februari 2007

    In februari a new AV Comparatives test will arrive.
    Any idea when it will be released?

    I know Trend is never competing, but I'm very curious how they will do.
    Also I hear only a few will do good this time?

    who will it beo_Oo_O??:rolleyes:
     
  10. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    Re: AV Comparatives Februari 2007

    1st march i think....
     
  11. TonyW

    TonyW Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Posts:
    2,741
    Location:
    UK
    Re: AV Comparatives Februari 2007

    The February results don't usually appear till 1 March or thereafter.
     
  12. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    Re: AV Comparatives Februari 2007

    FYI: av-comparatives is changing server. due that, the website may be unreachable for some hours during the next days (and displays some errors).
    the website code will be re-written (optimized) and the website speed should be faster.
     
  13. dan_maran

    dan_maran Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Posts:
    1,053
    Location:
    98031
    Re: AV Comparatives Februari 2007

    Sounds good! :thumb:
     
  14. Durad

    Durad Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2005
    Posts:
    594
    Location:
    Canada
    Re: AV Comparatives Februari 2007

    Lets guess....

    1 - KAV based
    2 - AntiVir
    3 - NOD32
    .....
     
  15. Inspector Clouseau

    Inspector Clouseau AV Expert

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Posts:
    1,329
    Location:
    Maidenhead, UK
    Re: AV Comparatives Februari 2007

    Only guess i make is that since IBK has included comodo into the test results that they are having less than 30 percent detection.
     
  16. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    Re: AV Comparatives Februari 2007

    Comodo and others will be tested in a separate test whcih will be published mid-March. Please wait some more weeks, also my own predictions were wrong. we will see.
     
  17. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    Re: AV Comparatives Februari 2007

    I´m waiting for the FPs :p
     
  18. plantextract

    plantextract Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Posts:
    392
    Re: AV Comparatives Februari 2007

    @IBK, comodo says their strong point is the hips, so you have to execute the malware to get results from it. will this test be like kav's pdm test?

    also, are there any plans to change the testing methodology in the future, seeing as more AVs begin adopting different solutions then signatures and heuristics?
     
  19. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,886
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    no. since comodo is called an antivirus and not comodo HIPS, the test is legit. as seen in other tests, making a HIPS which warns about everything and due that gets high results is a quite easy task, while delivering a good antivirus with high detection rates is much more difficult.
     
  20. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    is comodo really only 30% detection? *lol*
     
  21. lucas1985

    lucas1985 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2006
    Posts:
    4,047
    Location:
    France, May 1968
    Re: AV Comparatives Februari 2007

    IMHO, AV-Comparatives´ tests are mainly focused to AV engines, not security solutions.
     
  22. plantextract

    plantextract Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Posts:
    392
    Re: AV Comparatives Februari 2007

    yes, but it might not be possible to keep those 2 separated for long. avs are getting different things, that stops separating them from the traditional Avs .
     
  23. lodore

    lodore Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Posts:
    9,065
    avast advanced maybe?
    lodore
     
  24. C.S.J

    C.S.J Massive Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Posts:
    5,029
    Location:
    this forum is biased!
    IBK has said alot wont be getting advanced+ which tells me the test this time round is a difficult one,

    still hoping for an advanced from dr.web though :rolleyes:
     
  25. plantextract

    plantextract Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Posts:
    392
    i wonder which of the regular A+ will get a lower value, avira,nod32,kav,bitdefender,symantec etc.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.