Favourite browser - 2012

Discussion in 'polls' started by carat, Jan 8, 2012.

?

Which is your favourite web browser?

  1. Internet Explorer

    32 vote(s)
    9.8%
  2. Mozilla Firefox

    150 vote(s)
    45.9%
  3. Google Chrome

    69 vote(s)
    21.1%
  4. Safari

    5 vote(s)
    1.5%
  5. Opera

    49 vote(s)
    15.0%
  6. Other

    22 vote(s)
    6.7%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jo3blac1

    jo3blac1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    Posts:
    739
    Location:
    U.S.
    OMG, opera took 200mb more RAM than FF out of my total of 6GB.... Today RAM usage is no longer what makes programs lite, it is the CPU usage that matters the most. Opera happens be less CPU intensive on my computer than Chrome, FF or IE10. It's by far the fastest browser for me. Of course if you have 10 core desktop, 6GB RAM then the fastest browser will be the one which actually renders pages faster, in such case probably IE10 or Chrome. Take same CPU but with 256mb of RAM and then Opera will be slowest. Seriously the speed of the browser depends on the system, desktop vs laptop, single, vs dual vs quad core, etc.

    You cannot say that Opera is in trouble because it uses more RAM, we need more data. How much CPU usage? How fast does it render pages? And BTW, Im not Opera fanboy. I actually don't like their UI a lot. Im running Pale Moon 64 bit, which on my set up is the 2nd fastest browser. Most of the speed comes from using very little CPU. It renders pages much slower than IE 10 or Chrome but both of these freeze my laptop.
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2012
  2. moontan

    moontan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Posts:
    3,931
    Location:
    Québec
    you can create a portable version from the installer itself.

    just select Options in the lower left when installing and choose 'USB portable installation'.
     
  3. Solarlynx

    Solarlynx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Posts:
    2,015
    Moontan, thank you. How could I miss it? Now I'll try all my browsers in portable version.
     
  4. moontan

    moontan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2010
    Posts:
    3,931
    Location:
    Québec

    no probs.
    glad to help! :)
     
  5. Solarlynx

    Solarlynx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Posts:
    2,015
    Why the post of Wild Hunter was erased? I find it useful.

    Wild Hunter wrote:
    "Opera Portable from PortableApps.com is the official portable version of this browser.
    http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/opera_portable
    "Publisher: PortableApps.com (John T. Haller) and Opera Software ASA
    Opera, Portable Edition is packaged with permission from Opera Software ASA. Opera™ is a trademark of Opera Software ASA.""

    The mentioned site is devoted to portable apps. I think it can be interesting for many users.
    Thank you, Wild Hunter.
     
  6. Wild Hunter

    Wild Hunter Former Poster

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2012
    Posts:
    1,375
    I'm not really sure it's an "official version" (although they have authorization from Opera Software to make it). I don't know if Opera Software gives any kind of official support to specific issues of Opera Portable from PortableApps.com. That's why I erased my post.
     
  7. ams963

    ams963 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Posts:
    6,039
    Location:
    Parallel Universe
    Very interesting. Thanks a lot for explaining. :):thumb: One question. How to fill in the gap of the SBIE unable to restrict tabs from each other, Javascript rendere(most exploitable area) from a web page,etc? And if I use NoScript and sbie on Firefox should I be worried about tabs open to exploitation and attacks due to lack of separate process sandboxing by SBIE?
     
  8. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    There's no way to enforce tab isolation on Firefox. If the Firefox process is exploited, it's all compromised. You can supplement with NoScript to make exploitation more difficult, and I suggest using EMET as well.

    I wouldn't be too worried about it as browsers aren't attacked too often in the wild anymore, other than IE.
     
  9. WSFfan

    WSFfan Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Posts:
    374
    Location:
    The Earth
    Plenty of systems...
     
  10. elapsed

    elapsed Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Posts:
    7,076
    Sorry for damaging your opinion/"feelings" with fact. Considering Chrome and IE make use of hardware acceleration by default, you can bet they use less CPU. I don't need feelings to come to that conclusion, just logic.
     
  11. jo3blac1

    jo3blac1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2012
    Posts:
    739
    Location:
    U.S.
    The fact is that both IE and Chrome make my laptop crawl to a freeze while Palemoon works like a charm. IE is by far the worst offender. So hardware acceleration is pointless on my set up.
     
  12. ams963

    ams963 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Posts:
    6,039
    Location:
    Parallel Universe
    Ah got it. Thanks a lot. :thumb: One thing though. If FF with NS is good for banking and Chrome is good for preventing system compromise, should we be worried about the fact that security apps like avast! base their banking/shopping security around a Chrome browser? Of course some of them like avast have secure vpn, dns, etc services available with their security. But.....:doubt:
     
  13. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    I'd have to know more about the Avast sandbox. I don't think sandboxing is too applicable to banking. But if they're also blocking key log attempts or some such thing it could help.
     
  14. ams963

    ams963 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Posts:
    6,039
    Location:
    Parallel Universe
    Here you go. ;) http://www.avast.com/lp-safezone
     
  15. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    Based on that it sounds like they might be using alternate desktop tokens, which Windows uses for UI Isolation, among other things. This would be a very legitimate way to prevent keylogging if they used a separate UID, and assuming that there aren't holes in the policy (there almost always are, but depending on the implementation it may or may not matter as much).

    The link didn't have too much info, I'll probably look for more, but not today. Today is for food.
     
  16. ams963

    ams963 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Posts:
    6,039
    Location:
    Parallel Universe
  17. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,146
    Eh, still doesn't have much information. The most info given is that it has something to do with Chromium, which could mean quite a lot.

    If I were to do an "inside out" sandbox it would be separate UID and desktop token. If they're doing that, it's pretty good.
     
  18. ams963

    ams963 Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Posts:
    6,039
    Location:
    Parallel Universe
    Yeah you're right. I'm drifting this to off-topic. I'll stop it here. FF with NoScript is good for banking/shopping is all I needed to know. Thanks for that.:thumb: I just wanted to learn it more elaborately. :) But as no substantial info is available.....
     
  19. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Have you tried Maxthon 3 Portable? :)

    http://www.maxthon.com/mx3/
     
  20. Solarlynx

    Solarlynx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Posts:
    2,015
    Thank you for a hint Maxthon really looks cool. I will try it as I see mail addons there. Unfortunately there is no inbuilt mail like in Opera.
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2012
  21. Solarlynx

    Solarlynx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Posts:
    2,015
    I've tried it. Unfortunately there is no inbuilt mail here, and mail addons only for gmail and yahoo.
     
  22. SouthPark

    SouthPark Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Posts:
    740
    Location:
    South Park, CO
    Opera with a custom userscripts folder and Fanboy's ad block list :D I've never used Maxthon but plan to try it soon.
     
  23. tlu

    tlu Guest

    Hm ... perhaps. But - have you checked if it also allows 3rd party scripts if you allow JS for a domain? I doubt that since the shortcut in the context menu points to the Chrome JS settings - and we all know that Chrome allows 3rd party scripting once you allow it for a specific site. And that's the advantage of ScriptNo: Although it's not always reliable (probably due to the buggy API it's using), it blocks 3rd party scripts by default
     
  24. Daveski17

    Daveski17 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Posts:
    10,239
    Location:
    Lloegyr
    Since the PrefBar update for SeaMonkey was not much of a success, & I uninstalled the extension, I have been using Opera a lot the past couple of days. It is now the default browser on my notebook.

    I have had a love/hate relationship with Opera for years. I usually love to hate it LOL!

    So ... at this very point in time ... it is Opera.
     
  25. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    8,738
    I've switched from Firefox to Chrome. With lots of extensions, I really notice the increased speed and stability.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.