Facebook attempts to clear up privacy questions

Discussion in 'privacy general' started by ronjor, May 14, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,770
    Location:
    Texas
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57433878-83/facebook-attempts-to-clear-up-privacy-questions/
     
  2. dw426

    dw426 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Posts:
    5,543
    People just need to face the reality that a service like Facebook can only offer so much privacy before the service becomes rather pointless. Again, if you're worried about where your data goes and what is done with it, steer clear of such services. I'm very critical of both Facebook and Google, however, they've both stated time and again that they are built on data. Either that needs to be accepted or one needs to find alternatives/stay away.
     
  3. JackReacher

    JackReacher Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2012
    Posts:
    67
    Location:
    South of the North Pole
    This is true, however, Facebook (and Google) are a long way from this point that you speak of. For instance Facebook could still make a profit if they:
    1. Stopped tracking Facebook users against their will, outside of the FB ecosystem, through cookies, web bugs, widgets, and other dishonest methods
    2. Delete all FB cookies when a user logs off
    3. Overtly state that they will not disclose your identity to third party advertisers/trackers, and that they will never sell your personal information in a non-anonymized format, or transfer it due to buyout or bankruptcy

    Facebook could still, transparently track users within the FB ecosystem/domain, track users through the "like button" transparently, and offer advertisers targeted advertising without disclosing the real IDs of those being targeted.

    Realistically, FB will not do this as its counter to their bottom line, and business ethic (or lack-there-of).

    These companies could profit off of our data in a responsible and ethical manner if they chose to. Google, in my opinion, tries to find this balance, but often sacrifices privacy/control for greater integration/fluidity/PROFIT.

    Alternatives to Google:
    • Google Search: DuckDuckGo or Startpage
    • Gmail: Hushmail, Vmail, your own mailserver, etc
    • Google Chrome: Firefox, Ironware, Comodo Dragon

    Edit: if you like Google's particular search results use startpage (which provides google results anonymously), if this doesn't do it for you, use Google SSL search combined with the "trackmenot" extension which obfuscates your real searches through fake searches based on a few different RSS feeds.

    Alternatives to FB:

    This is not so easy, a social network is useful and valuable due to the number of users it has. You can't just go out and pick an alternative social network if none of your friends/colleagues use that network.

    Diaspora is one alternative which is gaining momentum and is based around openness, transparency, and privacy to an extent. Other alternatives like Priv.Ly are trying to build services which will allow you to protect your data within FB and allow it to work across multiple social networks.



    In regards to the article,
    It seems like a typical response from Facebook. They payed lots of lip service to privacy, admitted some of their shortcomings, without really explaining how they leverage your data, and the control they actually have over it, or setting any limits as to how they can use your data.
     
    Last edited: May 21, 2012
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.