F-Prot?

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by bellgamin, Apr 27, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
    No. I am not currently planning to trial or switch to another Av, but I like to stay informed with an eye to the future. So if the info at Majorgeeks is erroneous pressure should be brought to bear to at least change the screen shot and to say the product can be updated manually.
     
  2. flyrfan111

    flyrfan111 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,229
    Auto updating works for the trial version, been using it here for almost 30 days and no probs.
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2007
  3. dw2108

    dw2108 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Posts:
    480
     
  4. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
     
  5. dw2108

    dw2108 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Posts:
    480
     
  6. The Hammer

    The Hammer Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Posts:
    5,752
    Location:
    Toronto Canada
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2007
  7. glentrino2duo

    glentrino2duo Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Posts:
    310
    wow, can you say that again in english? :)
     
  8. bellgamin

    bellgamin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    8,102
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Hmmmmmo_O
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2007
  9. LowWaterMark

    LowWaterMark Administrator

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Posts:
    18,280
    Location:
    New England
    Come on, Dave, this type of answer is really not helpful. The original poster was not talking about fluid dynamics or any such thing. He was asking if anyone had a way to accurately measure how much performance impact an anti-virus real-time monitor places on a PC. Answers like that one will simply derail a thread and cause other people to go off-topic, so let's leave those types of posts for scientific forums.
     
  10. dw2108

    dw2108 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Posts:
    480
    Look, I'm sorry that I am not well in explaining ideas. Information is ipso facto a fluid, and is treated as such. The drag corresponds exquisitely to the the wing drag encountered in aerodynamics, id est, an instance of fluid dynamics. I was hoping that my response to the question, would allow one to find easily some relevant data on the internet. I meant no damned harm!

    Dave HAL
     
  11. rollers

    rollers Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Posts:
    507
    Location:
    UK
    This is................window locks ?
    mortice locks ?
    yale locks ?

    No, its ................BOW
     
  12. dw2108

    dw2108 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Posts:
    480
    I've finally worked out some r.m.s. drag numbers for a program. Hope they help. DRAG = approximately constant x (# of kernel threads of program)/(total # of kernel treads) x 100 , where constant = approx. 1.25 - 1.45 for pentium IV, and about 1.55 - 1.75 for a P II or PIII, and for a P I about 1.8 - 1.9. Overtaxing a processer often produces nearly pure drag.

    Dave

    P.S. LowWaterMark, is this answer more along the lines of the one sought? If not, I can delete it.

    P.P.S. I forgot to say, these figures assume that the processor is operating in a cool environment, e.g, 10% of its max thermal coefficient, i.e. it's not burning up. I did not have time to collect info on processors other than Pentiums. Sorry about that. Heat increases junction capacitance which both attenuates, shifts and retards the data being processed. For a very hot processor, a good approximation for Pentiums is to multiply these numbers by 15.
     
    Last edited: Jul 7, 2007
  13. tec505

    tec505 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Posts:
    284
    Location:
    Romulus, class M planet
    I'm trying F-P on 2 my business PC: the 1st w/win 2K, the 2nd w/win XP.
    On the 1st it run very well. No slowing dowin. On th 2nd some 2/3 seconds freezings. Before I tested Dr-web on the 2nd PC too. Never had this problem. Is it possible that F-Prot like better new and fresh installation PCs?

    And what about compared w/ AVG?

    Best regards.
    Mike
     
  14. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,024
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    Any differences in what is running in real-time with FPAV 6 on the two machines? In this regard, you could also use the exclude function for any real-time security applications you are running with FP.

    IME, it is not too fussy but make sure you have completely uninstalled any previous AV's on your second machine. So make sure for example, you have no remnants of Dr Web left. You could also try a REPAIR of FPAV from the uninstall option.
     
  15. tec505

    tec505 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Posts:
    284
    Location:
    Romulus, class M planet
    Hi Blackcat.
    Any other real time security sw. IMO the 2nd PC has too old installation, 'cause of too much installation/uninstallation of security software during years: ZA ISS, BD, AVIRA, and Dr-Web and now F-P.
    May be Dr-Web react better then others in dirty/old SO installations.

    The real problem is that I'm not so happy in re-building this machine. So I'm looking for and trying an AV that do not interfere too much w/ this situation.

    And about AVG? Could you tell me if it is really heavier than F-Prot?

    Thanks in advance.
    Mike
     
  16. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,024
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    IME, Dr Web is a lot more sensitive to other software and prefers a clean machine. Why not try a good registry cleaner such as RegSupreme.

    IME, AVG is lighter than FPAV 6, as the latters Guard scans ALL files. If you are looking for other light AVs, other candidates to try include NOD, VBA32, and AntiVir.
     
  17. tec505

    tec505 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Posts:
    284
    Location:
    Romulus, class M planet
    Another good idea: I can try VBA32 (it's very cheap - that's an important aspect too :D )

    M.
     
  18. Blackcat

    Blackcat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    4,024
    Location:
    Christchurch, UK
    The new version 3.12.1 is due for release very soon. This has a lighter memory footprint and a faster scan speed than previous versions.

    You can download the latest commercial release of the Personal version, 3.12.0 and then change the updater to ftp://open.by/vba/beta/update to obtain the v.3.12.1 beta. Very stable.

    IMHO, RegSupreme is a better registry cleaner than CCleaner.
     
  19. tec505

    tec505 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2006
    Posts:
    284
    Location:
    Romulus, class M planet
    Thank U!

    I'll try it for sure.

    Best Regards

    Mike
     
  20. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    new to F-prot and on the trial period.So far I like it was a smooth install runs very well and has a well laid out gui that very user friendly.I Hope it can compete in detection.



    i
     
  21. BuzzStone

    BuzzStone Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Posts:
    163
    Just get stoned and re-read it. It's actully quite hilarious!
     
  22. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    are you the former should got a dell dude that got fired for smoking weed.
     
  23. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Lets please try and stay on topic here which is F-Prot, not being stoned, or other AV's.

    Pete
     
  24. Dark Shadow

    Dark Shadow Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Posts:
    4,553
    Location:
    USA
    I agree peter sorry for the off topic reply back to buzzstone could not hold back sorry.
     
  25. Miyagi

    Miyagi Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2005
    Posts:
    426
    Location:
    None
    The new !Eldorado engine was introduced last month. It's a very easy AV to use and detection has gotten better with the newer engine. Also, the on-access scanner was optimized so it feels lighter.

    More about the !Eldorado engine here:
    http://forum.f-prot.com/index.php/topic,798.0.html
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.