F-Prot v3.16b - REVIEW

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Sputnik, Mar 8, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Sputnik

    Sputnik Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Posts:
    1,198
    Location:
    Москва
    I liked the idea to make reviews here... So here's mine, about the new F-Prot :)

    Installation:
    Easy as it can get, the standart installation or customize your own.

    Recource usage:
    No slowdown notice...
    F-StopW.exe - 400k - 3.020k (on-access scanner)
    fdavupdm.exe - 1.544k (update monitor)
    Holy... The lowest memory usage I've ever seen...

    Detection:
    I recommend decide this your own at: http://www.av-comparatives.org/
    But you can't deny that the F-Prot detection is not bad at all :)

    Interface:
    It's plain and simple. If you are a professional user you will like it... Computer n00bs/newbies will find it to complicated.

    Personal opinion:
    A very nice product I think. The scanner is just fast and takes so less ram that's wonderfull. The detection is just ok, nothing special. But I think it will protect you right. The price is very low too, that's an big plus.
    Besides of that, F-Prot has fast updates on new big threats...

    Please comment your review. I used it for some hours now and I like it :)

    (scanning ~23500 files took 6:03 minutes)
     
  2. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,089
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Buy it...I think its a good product. But I use ArcaVir already and love it.
     
  3. Sputnik

    Sputnik Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Posts:
    1,198
    Location:
    Москва
    lol with what money :p as long I got my free F-Secure license I use that ;)
     
  4. RejZoR

    RejZoR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    I was totally dissapointed with F-Prot. No matter what i have thrown at it, it has hardly ever catch anything. F-Prot also has a very bad detection on Jotti (similar detection as for standalone Win version).
    No matter what i see on VB100% and other reviews i'm dissapointed with F-Prot.
    And everyone is talking about F-Prot like the best thing on earth. Hell even free AntiVir,AVG and avast! detected more when i tried.
     
  5. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,089
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
  6. RejZoR

    RejZoR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    DOS viruses or old stuff. When i tried actual ITW stuff collected by me (usually from other users PCs and from P2P) almost nothing was cought. Very bad.
     
  7. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,089
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Well....Thanks for that!
     
  8. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,008
    I've been using F-Prot for Windows for about 3 years. I can only judge by the result: It has kept me virus free. It does pop up and block stuff occasionally on some websites. So i am a happy users.

    Pete
     
  9. clansman7

    clansman7 Guest

    the only thing i hate about f-prot is the lacking of incremental updates
    and the poor configurability..
     
  10. Sputnik

    Sputnik Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Posts:
    1,198
    Location:
    Москва
    I don't think that's very true... I tested here with some very recent worms and trojans, catched them all...
     
  11. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,089
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Where'd you get the samples?
     
  12. Sputnik

    Sputnik Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Posts:
    1,198
    Location:
    Москва
    A nice e-mail to Frisk and you get them :)
     
  13. RejZoR

    RejZoR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    Sure they'll be detected if they are from FRISK :rolleyes:
     
  14. Sputnik

    Sputnik Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Posts:
    1,198
    Location:
    Москва
    lol, it's Frisk not Symantec :p
    The samples contained the latest viruses like:
    W32/Sober.M@mm
    W32/Kelvir.C
    W32/Kelvir.D
    W32/Kelvir.B
    Ofcource they're from the company it's self... But I think you should give them a chance... :)
     
  15. RejZoR

    RejZoR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    lol you don't understand me. If they posses the samples,they've already added them to virus definitions for sure (i'm 300% positive about that).
     
  16. hollywoodpc

    hollywoodpc Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Posts:
    1,325
    lol . YUP
     
  17. Technodrome

    Technodrome Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    2,140
    Location:
    New York
    You got VIRUS samples directly from FRISK? Is that what you are saying?



    tECHNODROME
     
  18. Technodrome

    Technodrome Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    2,140
    Location:
    New York
    I am eager to know what kind of ITW virus collection you got there that F-Prot is not able to detect. :)




    tECNODROME
     
  19. RejZoR

    RejZoR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    Yeah,if so i'm very interested in those legendary viruses that were crawling around years ago. I had a very nice database of many legendary viriis,but it got corrupted :( Bye bye Melissa,BubbleBoy,DAME,Brain...
    I would also like to get hands on first polymorphic virii known as Tequila.
    State of the art stuff. Priceless collection(well,it was),at least for me.

    EDIT: I use term ITW for all malware that can be obtained in any way by normal users. I don't care about stupid ITW and ZOO sample crap. How can it be ZOO if i can get it off WWW sites or P2P? :rolleyes:
     
  20. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,533
    This is a very nice AV, but lacks email clients support and incremental updates, so it's a nice for backup...
     
  21. RejZoR

    RejZoR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    I can't remamber anymore because that was like 4 months ago (probably 5 since its already march...)
     
  22. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,089
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    RejZoR,

    I can give you source code for Melissa, and possibly for LoveLetter, Blaster, Bagle and NetSky. Want?
     
  23. bellgamin

    bellgamin Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    6,151
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Frisk promised us version 4 of F-prot by late 2004. Then they moved the date to early in 2005. Still a dream -- vaporware.

    So now comes a "b" update. Not even 3.17 -- just 3.16b!

    I can see it now. March 2010 & we all shout joyfully: "O boy! Here comes 3.16z." :doubt:
     
  24. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,089
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Nope. By March 2010 we'll have v3.16.000000001bz :)
     
  25. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,533
    It's very bad for a company not fulfill of the established dates...
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.