extremely slow scan with nod 32

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by bigc73542, Oct 8, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    No I have never had a KAV av or a KAV clone av on this computer. ;)
     
  2. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    I was not going to reinstall nod but I did so I could post the results so you can see what it is actually doing
     

    Attached Files:

  3. Stan999

    Stan999 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2002
    Posts:
    566
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX USA
    I don't consider that really slow for 272,868 in 30:07 with all options marked?

    On mine it is about the same.
    number of scanned files: 259792
    number of viruses found: 0
    time of completion: 11:14:24 total scanning time: 1551 sec (00:25:51)

    I did note you posted "136967 files in 18 minutes with panda platinum 7".
    That doesn't seem that fast for just 136,967 files.
     
  4. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    here are what the settings look like I scaned with
     

    Attached Files:

  5. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma

    if you will notice what command will scan the same files in, my command av will scan in seven minutes.

    but I have been looking at some of the other peoples scan times with nod and Mine is not that far off. I might just have been expecting to much. I will admit that nod is scanning faster after this reinstall than before. :D
     
  6. BlueZannetti

    BlueZannetti Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Posts:
    6,590
    bigc,

    Just so you have the comparison with respect to my scan performance, a snapshot of my settings is below. I don't do email since comcast does at the server, and NOD32 does it again on delivery, and I don't want to beat a dead horse. Don't use AH at this time, nor do I do the potentially dangerous app thing.

    Blue
     

    Attached Files:

  7. Stan999

    Stan999 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2002
    Posts:
    566
    Location:
    Fort Worth, TX USA
    Your scan time with NOD and all options marked seems pretty normal to me. I would have to admit that if Command AV will scan 272,868 files in 7 minutes that is pretty darn fast.
     
  8. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    command will scan in that time with comparable settings. And yes it is fast. But now that my expectations have been put in perspective I will leave nod on here and give it another try. you guys on the nod support forum are great, I really do appreciate the time you have put towards this problem.
    Thanks
    bigc
     
  9. BlueZannetti

    BlueZannetti Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Posts:
    6,590
    bigc,

    You've piqued my interest. I'll turn on the AH and Pot. Dan. Apps switches for tonights scan and post the outcome tomorrow AM, just to get a feel for the hit here. E-mail will still be off, but it will be close to your current settings.

    Blue
     
  10. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    i guess I was luckier than I thought when I won a copy of nod. And it is a bonus that it plays nice with command av also. And it seems to like the rest of the apps. on my comp.
     

    Attached Files:

    • eye.jpg
      eye.jpg
      File size:
      11.1 KB
      Views:
      161
  11. nonmirecordo

    nonmirecordo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Posts:
    145
    Location:
    Cambridgeshire, UK
    An oxymoron, surely.
    ;)
     
  12. Howard

    Howard Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2004
    Posts:
    313
    Location:
    Wales, UK
    Just a little bit of statistics. While Panda Platinum 7 might seem as though it was scanning faster than NOD, it was in fact slower. From the figures provided by bigc73542 (figures rounded up):

    NOD scanned 272868 files in 1807 seconds = 146 files/second

    Panda Platinum 7 scanned 136967 files in 1080 seconds (18 mins) = 127 files/second
     
  13. BlueZannetti

    BlueZannetti Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Posts:
    6,590
    bigc,

    Here my stats below with your settings minus the e-mail scan. The 3 infections now picked up are real in that they are related to the TH Trojansimulator. They were present, but not ID'ed, for the other scan results posted by me - guess that's a reasonable argument alone in favor of these settings.

    So, at the end of the day the run time was increased by about 10 minutes on a nominal 60 minute scan, or a speed penalty of 17%, not bad actually.

    Blue
     

    Attached Files:

  14. puff-m-d

    puff-m-d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    5,703
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    Hi bigc,

    I just wanted to give you some info for comparison. Of course these results are on my system.

    Screenshot # 1 show a full scan with all possible options checked.
     

    Attached Files:

  15. puff-m-d

    puff-m-d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    5,703
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    Screenshot # 2 shows with the advanced heuristics and potentially dangerous applications not checked.
     

    Attached Files:

  16. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    Not a bad penalty at all for the extra protection ;)
     
  17. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma

    A two minute difference is not worth disabling AH and PDA IMO.
     
  18. puff-m-d

    puff-m-d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    5,703
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    There is an increase in scan time of 2:14 using all options. This is about a 14% decrease in performance. Before this release, advanced heuristics was only available thru a separate download and the command line. ESET warned that it would slow down scans a lot. But even on my system, NOD32 scans a lot faster than others and is doing so much deeper and more heuristically than other AV's. With all options checked and as many files as you are scanning, I think your times look good.

    HTH ;) ...
     
  19. puff-m-d

    puff-m-d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    5,703
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    I do not think so either. It piked up a couple of file on my machine with advanced heuristics that without it missed.
     
  20. Blackspear

    Blackspear Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2002
    Posts:
    15,115
    Location:
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
    Well BigC, you must be impressed, a lot of people jumped to help you very quickly, reckon if there was a speed test on this thread it would be close on a record ;) :D

    Good to see everthing is ok.

    Cheers :D
     
  21. Blackspear

    Blackspear Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2002
    Posts:
    15,115
    Location:
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
    I just worked it out, you were offering certificates:

    "I helped Master Yoda"

    Where's mine? ? ? ? ?

    :D :cool: :D :cool: :D
     
  22. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    As I posted earlier, I think the people on the nod support forum are a great bunch of people. They helped me to understand the nod program better. From useing other products I had a misconception about scanning speeds. There was not actuall a problem with the scan speed but just my perception from the way the other porgrams count files. I was never really against nod it was just my lack of knowledge of the program, but since all of the very timely replies I have a much better feeling about nod and am planning to keep it on here as my primary av now. Thanks again to everyone that took the time to reply to this.

    bigc
     
  23. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma

    You can consider yourself a Yoda helper in the first degree. :D ;)
     
  24. Blackspear

    Blackspear Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2002
    Posts:
    15,115
    Location:
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
    Woooooohooooooo

    :D :D :D :D :D
     
  25. bigc73542

    bigc73542 Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2003
    Posts:
    23,934
    Location:
    SW. Oklahoma
    I just reformated and installed my xp pro this time instead of xp home and after I got everything reinstalled I scanned with nod. It scanned 90658 files everything on the Hdd in 9.02 minutes, that is what I was hoping nod would do. I am a lot more satisfied now I guarantee.:D

    bigc
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.