Do you use Global Privacy Control?

But did you read what I wrote to @SeriousHoax ?
It's obvious that the “external” features of AG + uBo don't have the ability to modify an HTTP header.

 

It is interesting to note that uBlock Origin Lite can modify “HTTP Sec-GPC” to the value 1 using a DNR rule.
However, it does not yet have the ability to inject the script to modify “navigator.globalPrivacyControl” to the value true.
I have written a DNR rule for this purpose:




If any forum members want to analyze (and perhaps improve) the rule, I can add it to the thread.

 

That would be great.

 

Code:

action:
  type: modifyHeaders
  requestHeaders:
    - header: Sec-GPC
      operation: set
      value: 1
condition:
  urlFilter: *
  resourceTypes:
    - main_frame
    - sub_frame
    - xmlhttprequest
    - image
    - script
    - font
    - media
    - other
---

 

@Sampei Nihira your rule fails the test at Global Privacy Control.

 

Obviously, considering that “navigator.globalPrivacyControl” ≠ true.

P.S.

Gorhill should be urged (by others) to implement this feature, which is currently missing:

https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/discussions/400

 

Why use GPC if websites don't support it?
And how many websites support GPC?

For this website, there are only 64,183:
At the link below, you can see the list of websites that honor GPC:

https://well-known.dev/?q=resource:gpc gpc_support:true is_base_domain:true#results

To test the website you are interested in:

https://gpcsup.com/