Dizzying Intel chip choices

Discussion in 'other software & services' started by ronjor, Oct 12, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    164,145
    Location:
    Texas
    Story
     
    ronjor, Oct 12, 2005
    #1
  2. iceni

    iceni Guest

    they are also saying that that clock cycles aren't so important now, it's how much power there is in each cycle. i heard the most imporant thing about a chip is how much L2 caching it has, 512 is good
     
    iceni, Oct 12, 2005
    #2
  3. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    The L2 cache is dependent on the application, but nevertheless most everyday apps should gain healthy boosts with a larger L2 cache. 512KB is good, 1MB is even better ;)

    Even AMD's choices were confusing a while back, with Athlon 64 range on Socket 754, 939 as well as 940 :eek:

    Sempron on Socket 754 and Socket A.......AMD Athlon XP Socket A :eek:

    *Dizzy*
     
    Firecat, Oct 12, 2005
    #3
  4. Notok

    Notok Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Posts:
    2,969
    Location:
    Portland, OR (USA)
    Ah great, now Intel is going to do it.. I always have to look up AMD processors as it is, now I'll really have to do some reading up.
     
    Notok, Oct 13, 2005
    #4
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...