Citibank victimized by hackers, insists cardholders are safe

Discussion in 'privacy problems' started by PJC, Jun 10, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. PJC

    PJC Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Posts:
    2,959
    Location:
    Internet
  2. Hungry Man

    Hungry Man Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Posts:
    9,148
    "Security breaches happen, they're going to continue to happen ... the mission of the banking industry is to keep the customer base safe and customers feeling secure about their financial transactions and payments."

    Pretty much how I feel about it.
     
  3. Baserk

    Baserk Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2008
    Posts:
    1,317
    Location:
    AmstelodamUM
    I found the next sentence more interesting and more relevant;
    "That may be true, but feeling secure is not the same as being secure.
    How this information was acquired and why it wasn't protected against theft is a far more important question
    ."

    Marketing and PR can go a long way in making customers feel secure but they don't do anything for their actual security.
     
  4. J_L

    J_L Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    8,516
    It's always extremely dangerous when a bank is hacked. Your financial identity is extremely essential for a successful life.
     
  5. cm1971

    cm1971 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    Posts:
    727
    It amazes me how many of these banks and companies getting hacked have poor security and/or no encryption. TrueCrypt is free so they could have at least used it. It might not have prevented them from getting hacked but at least it would have kept the customers information out of their hands.
     
  6. PJC

    PJC Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Posts:
    2,959
    Location:
    Internet
    Despite the Money Banks own...:doubt:
     
  7. Enigm

    Enigm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2008
    Posts:
    188
    TrueCrypt, like all other disk-encryption, only protects unmounted volumes !!
    ie : The data is only inaccessible to illegitimate users when it is not accessible to legitimate users,
    and since the banks probably need to access the data .. Well, I think you get the picture,
    If a 'hacker' gains access to a network you may as well have him sit in front of one of the nodes on it !
     
  8. cm1971

    cm1971 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    Posts:
    727
    Then the only solution is to not put your money in a bank if you favor ease of use (access to data) over security.
     
  9. mvario

    mvario Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Posts:
    339
    Location:
    Haddonfield, IL
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.