CHIP.de Suite Tests December 2010

Their usual extensive series of apps and tests.
An interesting read regardless of your own perspectives.
-http://www.chip.de/artikel/Security-Suiten-Test_33262870.html-

If you ain't Deutsche, have fun with your favorite translator. Tschüß!

 

Ranking order as follows:

1. Norton Internet Security 2011
2. Bitdefender Internet Security 2011
3. F-Secure Internet Security 2011
4. Panda Internet Security 2011
5. G Data Internet Security 2011
6. Avira Internet Security 2011
7. Kaspersky Internet Security 2011
8. AVG Internet Security 2011
9. Mcafee Internet Security 2011
10. Comodo Internet Security 5.0

 

Norton as usual on top

 

The testing results are based on the same test as PCWorld I think.

 

A huge difference in the ranking for use the same test, I wonder if the protection offered by the AV's does not affect to the ranking what it does? the colour of the interface?

 

hahahaha comodo is the last one ?
human stupidity for money never ends!!

 

It comes first against zero-day malware

 

Nice, looks like G-Data did well but performance impact on systems was bad xD

 

guys, dont argue, theres no end to this

i somewhat agree in terms of detection for a year history except for bit defender

 

I think it really is, it did the same kind of tests: WildList, on-demand samples, and 25 real world samples; also the results look the same.
And mind there has been a lot of criticism about the PCWorld test. Where PCWorld clearly is inconsequent in rating (calling the same level of detection top-notch in one product, and poor in another). I actually think this CHIP.de test setup is more trustworthy, the interface seems less important here. A shame they didn't review ESET, although they did write the test results down somewhere. Instead of ESET they reviewed AVG.

 

Here's a screen copy of the only data that has any relevance in a test of security suites.

 

Thanks man!

 

thank you
but i dont trust it

 

sur-price surprise - norton won again...

 

Comodo lost again ...

 

Damn!

 

Norton is the best.

 

At what?

 

at what not do u think its not ??

 

Hey do not complain, they did not include Avast Internet Security in the test...the chickens.

 

I wouldn't give any credit to a guys that thinks that the most important feature of an AV is the colour of the interface.

Comodo was the only AV able to protect against the 100% of the threats in the dynamic test, and still is at the end of the ranking... I though that the mission of any AV was protect the user...

And the review in PCWorld? If you read it seems that they didn't understand how to use it, or what is a sandbox or HIPS, a very superfluous review centered in how hard was the registration process of Comodo Complete (paid) because the need to give an email

 

This review didn't rate Comodo at the end because of interface. CHIP.de describes the interface as: "the interface is ready for the competition." So that is quite positive.

The weak points according to CHIP.de are:
- Weak detection rates
- Many false positives
- No additional features (i.e. Parental Control etc.)

Detection details:
Wildlist (9.844 Virus samples): 98,60 %
Trojan (180.027 samples) 91,10 %
Backdoors/Bots/Virus/Worms (66.530 samples): 96,59 %
Zero Day drive-by attacks (20 in total, blocked/partially blocked/not blocked): 95 % / 5 % / 0 %
False positives (147.316 clean samples): 13
False positives during usage /on installation: both 1

 

I though they were using the same source of test than PCworld.
I see now that they didn't made any real time test.

Sorry for the mistake.

 

What??

 

thats good norton in the first
but whats happen to comodo internet security why its in the last