Certificate revocation and browsers

Discussion in 'privacy technology' started by BoerenkoolMetWorst, Apr 14, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
  2. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,873
    Location:
    Outer space
    If you use an AV with SSL/HTTPS scanning enabled, and it uses a MitM method, the browser cannot check for certificate revocation and the AV must do this.
    I've checked Bitdefender and ESET, both fail to warn.

    https://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/antivirus-web-http-shields-and-https-connections.359894



    @MrBrian, thanks for the links, there was some new info for me in there as well.

    I would say it is still better than nothing, and if there would be no OCSP, MitM attacks on massive scale would be easier and cheaper.
    We'll have to wait for new standards to become widely adopted to get some proper protection though.
    The 3 major browsers, IE, FF and Chrome already support OCSP stapling(well, at least the desktop versions) so hopefully it will be adopted by servers faster now.
     
  3. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    8,645
    Location:
    USA
    It did not give me the option to bypass. IE11 on Windows 8.1 update 1, 64 bit enhanced protected mode enabled.
     
  4. Minimalist

    Minimalist Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Posts:
    14,885
    Location:
    Slovenia, EU
    http://threatpost.com/openssl-heartbleed-and-the-value-of-crls/105572
     
  5. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
  6. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
  7. elapsed

    elapsed Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Posts:
    7,076
    I enabled that feature, thanks for the heads up.

    It annoys me when the chrome developers prioritize speed over security. Same reason you sometimes end up loading a Chrome page before an extension like ABP has loaded, they don't want to compromise speed by waiting for extensions to load when you open the browser.
     
  8. Minimalist

    Minimalist Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Posts:
    14,885
    Location:
    Slovenia, EU
    Since Chrome doesn't support "hard fail" revocation, enabling that option doesn't help much ...
     
  9. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,873
    Location:
    Outer space
    The article linked by MrBrian suggests OCSP Must Staple as a possible solution, there is a bug about implementing it in Firefox here, voting for it might attract more attention from the devs:
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901698
    Interesting related one:
    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672600

    I got the IE test from the Cloudflare challenge blog, they didn't specify version and OS. I'll add your result.
     
  10. BoerenkoolMetWorst

    BoerenkoolMetWorst Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Posts:
    4,873
    Location:
    Outer space
    I'm no longer able to edit my original list, so here is the updated version:


    Desktop

    Bitdefender SafePay browser
    Gives warning, but is a general warning, does not mention certificate has been revoked and allows bypass by user.

    Browser protected by Bitdefender HTTPS/SSL scanning(BD TS 17.27.0.1146)
    Gives no warning, no option to enable yourself
    Browser protected by ESET HTTPS/SSL scanning(ESS 7)
    Gives no warning, no option to enable yourself
    Browser protected by Kaspersky HTTPS/SSL scanning(KIS 14.0.0.4651(f))
    Gives warning
    , but allows bypass by user.


    Chrome:
    Gives no warning, users have to enable "Check for server certificate revocation" in options.(Disabled by default.)

    Chromium 36.0.1939.0
    Gives warning, denies access.

    Firefox:
    Gives warning, denies access.
    FF forks Seamonkey, Pale Moon and Cyberfox:
    Gives warning, denies access.

    Internet Explorer v?:
    Gives warning, but allows bypass by user.
    IE 11, Win 8.1 update 1, 64 bit enhanced protected mode enabled
    Gives warning, denies access.

    Maxthon 4.1.3.2000
    Gives warning, but is a general warning, does not mention certificate has been revoked and allows bypass by user.

    Opera 12.16:
    Gives warning, denies access.

    Opera 20:
    Gives warning, denies access.

    QupZilla 1.6.3
    Gives no warning, no option to enable yourself

    Safari:
    Gives warning, but allows bypass by user.


    Mobile

    Android 4.1.1, Builtin browser
    Gives no warning, no option to enable yourself
    Android 4.1.1, Opera Mobile Classic 12.16
    Gives warning, denies access.
    Android 4.1.1, Zirco browser 0.4.4 browser
    Gives no warning, no option to enable yourself

    Android 4.3, Builtin browser
    Gives no warning, no option to enable yourself
    Android 4.3, Chrome 34
    Gives no warning, no option to enable yourself
    Android 4.3, Firefox 28

    Gives warning, denies access.

    Android 4.4.2, Firefox
    Gives warning, denies access.

    iOS 7.1, Chrome
    Gives no warning, no option to enable yourself
    iOS 7.1, Ghostery Browser
    Gives no warning, no option to enable yourself
    iOS 7.1, Mercury Browser
    Gives no warning, no option to enable yourself
    iOS 7.1, Safari
    Gives no warning, no option to enable yourself
    iOS 7.1, Webroot SecureWeb
    Gives no warning, no option to enable yourself
     
  11. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
  12. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
    I've been having problems in the past week with www.google.com and news.google.com when using "hard fail" browser settings.
     
  13. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
  14. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
  15. Minimalist

    Minimalist Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2014
    Posts:
    14,885
    Location:
    Slovenia, EU
  16. SouthPark

    SouthPark Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Posts:
    737
    Location:
    South Park, CO


    Just tested IE 11 with Enhanced Protected Mode enabled on W7-64: shows warning, does not allow bypass​
     
  17. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
  18. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
    From Specific Implementations:
     
  19. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
    From the link in the last post:
     
  20. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
    Regarding post #44: That setting is indeed gone in the latest Chrome canary build, but it's not in the latest release version yet.
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2014
  21. MrBrian

    MrBrian Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Posts:
    6,032
    Location:
    USA
    You can complain here.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.