Can't push install to a 2003 SP1 server

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by dannyboy, Aug 1, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dannyboy

    dannyboy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Posts:
    113
    Location:
    UK
    Hi all

    I've never had a problem using Remote Admin Console to push install NOD to 2000 servers, but am getting problems pushing to 2003 servers running SP1.

    I'm sure it's nothing I'm doing wrong, as I've never had a problem with push installs before. Has anyone else seen this problem - is it NOD or SP1 which is at fault?

    thanks :)
     
  2. rumpstah

    rumpstah Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2003
    Posts:
    486
    Hi dannyboy:

    What is the error code in the console when a push is attempted?

     
  3. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,375
    No probs here, don't you have a firewall enabled?
     
  4. dannyboy

    dannyboy Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Posts:
    113
    Location:
    UK
    thanks for the replies

    the error message is "NOD32 Installer Service did not start on target computer within timeout period".

    The only firewall is one at the gateway level, but it doesn't affect the LAN at all.

    I was assuming there must have been some kind of update in 2K3 SP1 which is causing a problem. e.g. DEP (data execution prevention) o_O
     
  5. rumpstah

    rumpstah Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2003
    Posts:
    486
    More than likely the RAC communication ports are being blocked on the Server side.

     
  6. Shaun Nell

    Shaun Nell Guest

    Dannyboy, I am getting something similar. Did you ever fix it?
     
  7. Marcos

    Marcos Eset Staff Account

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Posts:
    14,375
    If you have RAS installed on Win2k, I'd suggest that you adjust RAS' properties and set it to run in an admin account instead of the default local system account.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.