bitdefender 9

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by shawn25, Jan 31, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. shawn25

    shawn25 Guest

    buy bitdefender 9 standard or wait for kaspersky 2006
     
  2. Happy Bytes

    Happy Bytes Guest

    :eek: :eek: :eek:
    Must be damn cold in sweden :eek: :eek: :eek:
     
  3. shawn25

    shawn25 Guest

    i wouldn't know how cold it is in sweden
     
  4. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    7,927
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Do what you like. Both are good AVs and will protect you well. :)
     
  5. Graystoke

    Graystoke Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2003
    Posts:
    1,502
    Location:
    The San Joaquin Valley, California
    Can't go wrong with BitDefender 9. :)
     
  6. mHKm

    mHKm Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Posts:
    14
    wait for kav
     
  7. Detox

    Detox Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    8,507
    Location:
    Texas, USA
    Between those two only - wait for KAV.
     
  8. Kasperky is very good.
    But when you have an older pc its slows it down.
     
  9. SwordOfSecurity

    SwordOfSecurity Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2005
    Posts:
    108
    Location:
    Canada
    bitdefender isn't bad, but i would say either wait for Kaspersky OR wait for Kaspersky and substitute with a freeware AV for the meantime (only if you really need some sort of protection soon)
     
  10. The best antivirus/antispyware/malware is no downloading of free mp3`s, screensavers and smiley`s.
     
  11. Mele20

    Mele20 Former Poster

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2002
    Posts:
    2,495
    Location:
    Hilo, Hawaii
    I beta tested KIS 2006. It reduces my 5ms down cable modem speed to 2ms. I already had BD free version. I got BD 9 Pro and it doesn't affect my internet speed in the slightest. Kaspersky may fix the problem before the end of the beta but this was an ongoing major problem from the time I joined the beta back last June and it was still a huge problem in January 2006. So, I don't have a lot of confidence that Kaspersky will fix this problem (or can fix it). I am not the only tester to see a GIGANTIC reduction in speed. A lot of folks are experiencing this. I don't pay $45 a month for 5ms down in order to get less than one-half of that. Without KIS on my box, I get 4.8ms down on a variety of speed tests that I do regularly. I have a powerful computer (XP Pro, 3.4GHz Pentium IV, 2GB RAM) so that has nothing to do with this problem. I am very happy with BD.
     
  12. Don Pelotas

    Don Pelotas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2004
    Posts:
    2,257
    As you have been told before Mele20, it is because of the webanti-virus, for some it will mean more bandwith loss than for others (that would be me, who has an 4mb connection, which with the web anti-virus is a 3.4mb connection. The point is that you can disable it, both during the install and after if you don't like it and you can in fact choose what components you want during the install, not exactly a bad thing and something most users have requested.

    Whether Kaspersky will be able to reduce the loss over the next 3-12 months is not something you or me can predict with any certainty, but i can tell you that build 270 is better in this regard than 269 and it is still beta.
     
  13. pykko

    pykko Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Posts:
    2,236
    Location:
    Romania...and walking to heaven
    between KAV and Bit Defender I would choose NOD32. :D
     
  14. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    7,927
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    NOD32 is good, but so is BitDefender, and I am forever conflicted between these two AVs. :'(
     
  15. bellgamin

    bellgamin Very Frequent Poster

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    5,648
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Heyyyy! Somebody ship that OT bloke off to Sweden.:D
     
  16. rdsu

    rdsu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Posts:
    4,456
    Between KAV and BitDefender, I will choose KAV...
     
  17. Albinoni

    Albinoni Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2005
    Posts:
    709
    Location:
    Perth, Western Australia
    When ever I read a review on the Bitdefender Security Suite or BD 9 Pro Plus it seems that their antivirus side of things does very well infact excellent, but the other side of things such as antispam, firewall, parental control seem to have an average score.

    I know BD has got its strong and weak point and its strong points are its AV engine. Hopefully over time it will improve on its other slightly weaker points.

    To be honest I cannot compare BD Pro 9 AV against KAV as to me they are both very good AV solutions plus again I've never used KAV so really cannot comment on it. KAV is a top notch AV and its Trojan detection is supposed to be the best out there, though NOD32 is catching up, though I think NOD32's AV detection and heutistics is prob better, but than again to me they both very good progs.

    Seriously speaking and to be honest if you were to choose between KAV and BD Pro 9 you cannot go wrong, in either way your PC will be very well protected.
     
  18. mvdu

    mvdu Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Posts:
    1,151
    Location:
    PA
    I bought Bitdefender 9 (AV part - am using Sygate Personal for firewall) just in case KIS 2006 doesn't work well. Using BD now, and it's been good. I believe KAV has better overall detection than both NOD32 and BitDefender, but the KIS beta causes me to lose my internet connection, and I'm not sure that will be fixed.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.