Bitdefender 8 vs MKS 2005

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by larouse, May 30, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. larouse

    larouse Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Posts:
    157
    Hi,

    I like hear your comments about how should be better option beteween:

    Bitdefender 8 Std vs MKS 2005

    Resource use, Rate, etc, etc,

    Thank you,
     
  2. Sputnik

    Sputnik Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Posts:
    1,198
    Location:
    Москва
    I think BitDefender is better then MKS_vir... BitDefender now has one of the best detection rates and good heurstics :)
     
  3. colorado13

    colorado13 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2005
    Posts:
    117
    Location:
    Orihuela, Spain
    Agree with StyleWarz.
    Advance+ for BitDefender, KAV and NOD32 in the latest Retrospective/ProActive Test (May 2005) of http://www.av-comparatives.org.
     
  4. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,053
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Detection:

    No competition. BitDefender is better than MKS, for the time being.

    Resource use:

    BitDefender is slightly heavier than MKS.

    Price:

    Pretty much the same.

    Heuristics:

    BitDefender wins.

    Overall:

    BitDefender wins.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.