Beta 4 !!!

Discussion in 'NOD32 Early v2 Beta' started by puff-m-d, Mar 28, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. puff-m-d

    puff-m-d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    4,450
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
  2. LowWaterMark

    LowWaterMark Administrator

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2002
    Posts:
    17,875
    Location:
    New England
    There you go again Kent - being the first one to find the new beta.

    You sure you aren't actually one of the developers in disguise? ;)
     
  3. hayc59

    hayc59 Guest

    so, how is it??
     
  4. the Tester

    the Tester Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Posts:
    2,854
    Location:
    The Gateway to the Blue Hills,WI.
    Thanks Kent.

    I'm downloading it.
    I hadn't thought to look for a new beta!
     
  5. the Tester

    the Tester Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Posts:
    2,854
    Location:
    The Gateway to the Blue Hills,WI.
    I ran the new beta 4.

    The scan works like it always does.
    I did notice a few new items. :)

    There is a progress bar when NOD32 is scanning.
    I never noticed this before.

    There is a new component or module listed.EMON.
    It's MS Outlook/Exchange e-mail protection.

    These are nice additions IMO.
     
  6. tosbsas

    tosbsas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    789
    Location:
    Lima, Peru
    Anyone has a list of changes??

    Is the right click issue fixed?? And the spampal??

    Ruben
     
  7. marti

    marti Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2002
    Posts:
    646
    Location:
    Houston, Texas, USA
    NOD32, beta 4, has the same problem with Trojan Hunter as previous versions. That is, TH "hangs" when checking for updates (the LiveUpdate component) or when calling up the program. As before, if I disable AMON, all TH components work as they should. :(
     
  8. That's too bad Marti... That is probably "THE" Thing that is driving me further and further away from NOD32.. Amon and it's conflicts...
    :(
     
  9. MickeyTheMan

    MickeyTheMan Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    1,016
    As soon as system loaded i knew beta 4 still had sockets problem on my sys anyway as it conflicts with spyblocker and i loose connectibity to the net.
     
  10. rumpstah

    rumpstah Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2003
    Posts:
    486
    Did you try the IMON/Setup/Repair Now function? It should fix your issue. :D
     
  11. Blackspear

    Blackspear Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2002
    Posts:
    15,115
    Location:
    Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
    What is the difference between Administrator version and standard Beta 4 version, is it just for networks?

    Cheers :D
     
  12. MickeyTheMan

    MickeyTheMan Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    1,016
    Yes i did without success.
    Disabled spyblocker from starting at start up as it was complaining of another app using port 80 as well as Naviscope which was giving an error 10106 (can't create listening sock)
    Also changed settings in browser not to use pacfile and naviscope.
    Only way to get connectivity back was to disable imon.
     
  13. tosbsas

    tosbsas Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    789
    Location:
    Lima, Peru
    No problem here when calling the update - whats your system?? I am on win2k 160MbRam but just and old PII 233

    Yes it takes a little longer to start the programm as without Nod - I believe they still are fiddeling around with the upx packer

    Ruben
     
  14. bibbe

    bibbe Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2002
    Posts:
    86
    Location:
    Sweden
    After having had the same problems with ref-updates, as some of the guys in the old NOD32 forum has, I downloaded the NOD beta and for me it works fine on my windows ME, with TDS, BoClean, Adaware and Spybot. Only once I had a problem with AMON eating my physical memory with a speed of 4 megs in 10 seconds, without me working, but after a reboot it stopped and I have had no problems since

    bibbe
     
  15. marti

    marti Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2002
    Posts:
    646
    Location:
    Houston, Texas, USA
    Pentium -- 1 gig; 256MG ram; Win98SE.

    The TH LiveUpdate component works with AMON running, but it "hangs" and takes forever to execute compared to running it without AMON active. Same problem with the actual TH program.
     
  16. spy1

    spy1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Posts:
    3,139
    Location:
    Clover, SC
    Mickey - I'm using SB6.2 and have been using the following version of NOD:

    Information on installed NOD32 Antivirus System
    Version:   1.387 (2003032:cool:
    Virus signature database build:   3575

    Information on installed components
    NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP - base
    Version:   1.199.14
    NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP - Internet support
    Version:   1.199.15
    NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP - NOD32 On-demand Scanner
    Version:   1.199.14

    Operating system information
    Platform:   Windows XP
    Version:   5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
    Version of common control components:   5.82.2800
    RAM:   768 MB
    Processor:   AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (1325 MHz)


    No connectivity problems and SB isn't being blocked (prevented from using port 80) by anything (functioning correctly).

    Can you post a copy of your "Information"" info from NOD? Pete
     
  17. MickeyTheMan

    MickeyTheMan Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    1,016
    Information on installed NOD32 Antivirus System
    Version:   1.387 (2003032:cool:
    Virus signature database build:   3575

    Information on installed components
    NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP - base
    Version:   1.199.14
    NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP - Internet support
    Version:   1.199.15
    NOD32 For Windows NT/2000/XP - NOD32 On-demand Scanner
    Version:   1.199.14

    Operating system information
    Platform:   Windows 2000
    Version:   5.0.2195 Service Pack 3
    Version of common control components:   5.81.4916
    RAM:   384 MB
    Processor:   AMD-K7(tm) Processor (499 MHz)
     
  18. puff-m-d

    puff-m-d Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2002
    Posts:
    4,450
    Location:
    North Carolina, USA
    LWM,

    Just by luck I guess :D ..... I was running beta 2 and the auto-updater popped up and asked if I wanted the new version. I didn't even have to go looking ;) ...

    Regards,
    Kent
     
  19. Terry

    Terry Guest

    So far, so good with B4! No connectivity problems but found a strange thing when I ran HiJack This!.

    "Broken internet access because of LSP provider "imon.dll" missing"
    (imon.dll is there in C:\Windows\System and also in C:\ESET\Setup\02)o_O??

    Nothing wrong with my internet access, (DSL), works cause I'm here!
    EMail access is working too, using Outlook Exp. 6.0, Eudora, Incredimail.

    Had to set up email clients using server address not "localhost" as with POP3 Scan.

    Running SpyBlocker 6.2, SSD 1.2, Spyware Blaster and AdShield 3.0 beta. No problems so far.

    800 mhz. Celeron, 512 MB RAM, 30 GB HD, on LAN, DSL service.

    Information on installed NOD32 Antivirus System
    Version:   1.387 (2003032:cool:
    Virus signature database build:   3575

    Information on installed components
    NOD32 For Windows 95/98[me=]- base[/me]
    Version:   1.199.10
    NOD32 For 95/98[me=]- NOD32 On-demand Scanner[/me]
    Version:   1.199.10
    NOD32 For Windows 95/98[me=]- Internet support[/me]
    Version:   1.199.15

    Operating system information
    Platform:   Windows ME
    Version:   4.90.3000
    Version of common control components:   5.81.4916
    RAM:   504 MB
    Processor:   Intel(r) Celeron(tm) processor

    If anyone has any thoughts on the quoted info above from HiJack This! please comment.

    Thanks
    Terry o_O
     
  20. MickeyTheMan

    MickeyTheMan Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    1,016
    The same thing applies here. As soon as i enable imon, hijackthis gives me that message too. Once imon disabled that message disapears of course
     
  21. Karl

    Karl Guest

    A minor install issue: On older Win9x systems NOD has to replace the vc and mfc runtime libraries. As they are in use by other applications, the installer can's do so and simply exits instead of replacing them on a reboot. To succesfully install NOD you have to replace the libraries by hand... :( That might confuse "normal" users.
     
  22. marti

    marti Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2002
    Posts:
    646
    Location:
    Houston, Texas, USA
    What are you talking about? I use Win98SE and NOD works fine.
     
  23. spy1

    spy1 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Posts:
    3,139
    Location:
    Clover, SC
    Carl, can you run Hijack This and see if you get the same message?

    Mickey, our common control versions are different - is that just because our OS's are different? Pete
     
  24. controler

    controler Guest

    Win 98 is older than Win98 SE but me is thinking Mickey is running Win 2000 anyway, so Carl's install issue shouldn't apply should it?
     
  25. MickeyTheMan

    MickeyTheMan Security Expert

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2002
    Posts:
    1,016
    I think so.
    I also believe that somehow imon.dll does not registewr itself properly to the windows socket service and that the repair option does not fix it either although it says it does. The file is there is system32 folder.
    I do run a dual boot system, but the same problem applied to previous betas on both 98SE & win2k.
    It dows not matter whether i just activate imon and reloas sys or activate it & repair and reload. As soon as sys reloads, Naviscope can't create listening sock and Spyblocker can't use port 80 and browser looses access to net.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.