Best free imaging software?

Discussion in 'backup, imaging & disk mgmt' started by The Count, Oct 29, 2016.

  1. Stigg

    Stigg Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Posts:
    454
    Location:
    Dededo, Guam
    LOL, you aren't familiar with the full feature comparison then, LOL.
    LOL.
     
  2. oliverjia

    oliverjia Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Posts:
    1,926
    Why do I care? I didn't spend the money on it.
     
  3. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    My full images take around 18 minutes, but that is for 139GB. Huge difference. On my second system which is only 79gb, a full image is about 9min.
     
  4. Solarlynx

    Solarlynx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2011
    Posts:
    2,015
    There's almost direct proportionality.
     
  5. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Not surprising since both machines have the same setup save an upgrade to the motherboard.
     
  6. The Count

    The Count Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2016
    Posts:
    177
    Location:
    France
    Does the UEFI/Legacy boot settings of the new computer have to match the UEFI/Legacy boot settings of the computer you took the Windows 8.1 image? (or for Linux)
     
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2017
  7. Brian K

    Brian K Imaging Specialist

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Posts:
    12,175
    Location:
    NSW, Australia
    Not necessarily. You can restore GPT to MBR and vice versa but then you would have to convert GPT to MBR and vice versa. If the OS didn't boot it would be a storage controller driver issue and drivers would need to be installed. You can use TBOSDT Pro to install drivers into a non booting OS.
     
  8. guest

    guest Guest

    I do a backup only once with Windows backup (after a clean install from an upgrade of the OS) so to me a 15mn difference doesn't matter much, i use RX after for testing/crash issues , far faster than any classic imaging solutions.
     
  9. The Count

    The Count Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2016
    Posts:
    177
    Location:
    France
    Is a computer's system recovery partition party to the imaging process?
     
  10. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    My Bold. The last time I tested Rollback RX i found the speed of Rollback faster then classic imaging, but no faster the my Macrium Restores. Plus I have no issues taking images.
     
  11. guest

    guest Guest

    Restore a snapshot from RX is less than a minute on my system. Creating one is around 30sec.
     
  12. whitestar_999

    whitestar_999 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Posts:
    162
    My system is at service centre & hence the late reply.Actually that was the reason I imaged the system drive.I was running my win 7 system for 5 years without any reinstall/restore.I never had a need to use imaging softeare as my data on other drive is backed up in simple copy operation to external hdd & I never faced virus/malware issues either.The only time I have to use imaging is when leaving system at service centre due to hardware failure which was the case this time.As such there is no point in me buying any imaging software.However I do look for reliability in an imaging software even if I use it once a year/few years because that in my opinion is the fundamental thing to look for in an imaging software.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.