Best free imaging software?

Discussion in 'backup, imaging & disk mgmt' started by The Count, Oct 29, 2016.

  1. cloggy49

    cloggy49 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2015
    Posts:
    93
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    HHmm...strange. In the meantime I have Windows Agent V6 installed and running. This version enables me to create an BMR with Windows 10 PE.
    I agree it is quite some data stored to your disk. As mentioned before, I'll keep it installed for a while to see how it behaves.. :)
     
  2. MerleOne

    MerleOne Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Posts:
    1,336
    Location:
    France
    Getting back to the initial question, I now recommend AOMEI Backupper Free Edition, AOMEI was the only one to be able to restore a full drive where Macrium and other failed. Not the fastest but quite reliable. They once had a severe issue with an update, back in Summer 2015, after the update the PC wouldn't boot, which is annoying of you don't have a backup pre-installation of the update. But this was fixed since then and the latest version 3.5 runs fine from XP to Win10, the recovery media is Win PE based so it helps with external devices compatibility.
     
  3. The Count

    The Count Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2016
    Posts:
    177
    Location:
    France
    Incremental backup comes with paid version only?
     
  4. The Count

    The Count Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2016
    Posts:
    177
    Location:
    France
    I was after incremental backup but that only comes with paid version.
     
  5. The Count

    The Count Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2016
    Posts:
    177
    Location:
    France
    Does it offer incremental backup too for windows 8.1?
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2017
  6. The Count

    The Count Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2016
    Posts:
    177
    Location:
    France
    Does Aomei offer Incremental backup with their free version?
     
  7. The Count

    The Count Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2016
    Posts:
    177
    Location:
    France
    Any update on Arcserve Unified Data Protection and has it worked out so far? Will it work with Windows 8.1?
     
  8. The Count

    The Count Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2016
    Posts:
    177
    Location:
    France
    Best free version with incremental back-up for windows 8.1?
     
  9. blacknight

    blacknight Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Posts:
    3,347
    Location:
    Europe, UE citizen
  10. MerleOne

    MerleOne Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Posts:
    1,336
    Location:
    France
    O&O Incrementals are painfully slow !
     
  11. Stigg

    Stigg Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Posts:
    454
    Location:
    Dededo, Guam
    For a free application, I really think it is the best.
    You need to weigh up reliability against needing incremental backup. You also need to ask yourself if it is really that important? Full backups are quick anyway.
     
  12. Brian K

    Brian K Imaging Specialist

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Posts:
    12,146
    Location:
    NSW, Australia
    The Count,

    In your studies did you investigate Differential backups?
     
  13. whitestar_999

    whitestar_999 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Posts:
    162
    I just tried Aoemi free & Macrium free,both latest versions, & I can say macrium fared better. Main reason for this is Aoemi doing something with win 8.1 bcd store on a single hdd UEFI/GPT laptop which created issue with using macrium.

    Everything was done using only rescue media on usb created by both softwares.
    Actually in case of macrium I simply extracted rescue iso contents to "usb prepared to boot by aoemi" after moving aoemi files.

    In detail this is what happened.

    1.I created a full backup using macrium free but couldn't find option to create differential image so didn't tried restore.

    2.I created a full backup using aoemi & then after making some minor changes(uninstalling aoemi) created a differential image.

    3.Restored Aoemi differential image with option restore mbr(i think this was the option as I clearly remembered msg saying for system backup it is essential to restore mbr/track included already in image during creation as many times mbr/track may get corrupted) which was checked by default.I proceeded without changing anything & on next reboot system was restored.

    4.Found out how to create differential image using macrium rescue media usb so decided to try by creating a differential image based on base image created in 1.

    5.Tried restoring differential image by macrium & after restoring process,was greeted with a blue recovery screen saying pc needs to be repaired as a required device isn't connected or accessible.

    6.Rebooted the system & used macrium rescue media fix boot problems option.macrium did these steps:EFI partition found on disk 1,Removing old bcd,Creating BCD for C:\Windows.After reboot system was back to normal.

    7.Thought maybe something went wrong with macrium restore last time so repeated step 5 with same result as step 6 again.

    8.Thought aoemi did something to Windows bcd store after step 1 which is getting captured by the differential image made by macrium in step 4 so tested by creating a fresh full image using macrium rescue media usb again.

    9.Tried restoring fresh full image made by macrium & this time all went smoothly without any issues.

    Conclusion: Macrium lived upto its reputation of reliability.Though aoemi also did the job but I can not rely on a software which does something that is manageable only by that software & not by other softwares.From my experience it is clear that Aoemi did something to windows BCD store which was not normal procedure as it forced Macrium to do a repair of BCD which is basically nothing but windows own BCD repair commands.Another interesting thing to note was that Aoemi rescue usb media was modifying files on the boot usb itself so as to remember what it did last time as it was able to remember the path & creation time of base image to automatically show option for differential image creation unlike macrium where I have to manually select a base image on every reboot for creating a differential image.Most likely this was the reason how Aoemi able to reboot the system successfully after restoring possibly with an incorrect BCD configuration.
     
  14. ArchiveX

    ArchiveX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2014
    Posts:
    1,501
    Location:
    .
    :thumb:
     
  15. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    There is something here that doesn't make sense. You clearly are looking for reliabillity. In that case it doesn't make sense to me to restrict yourself to free imaging. If you want reliability you should be willing to pay to get the best.
     
  16. The Count

    The Count Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2016
    Posts:
    177
    Location:
    France
    Yes I did; incremental is meant to be quicker though.
     
  17. TheRollbackFrog

    TheRollbackFrog Imaging Specialist

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Posts:
    4,954
    Location:
    The Pond - USA
    ...but requires many more dependencies to return to a successful configuration than Differentials do.

    If you do frequent FULLs (and have a decent amount of storage), Differentials are a fine way to manage important images.
     
  18. The Count

    The Count Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2016
    Posts:
    177
    Location:
    France
    Best time of day to do the differential or FULLs; end of day (before you go to bed) or whilst working on something else
    on the computer?
     
  19. TheRollbackFrog

    TheRollbackFrog Imaging Specialist

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Posts:
    4,954
    Location:
    The Pond - USA
    Depends on the imaging software in use. Some (Macrium Reflect) can run at a very low priority and as a result, the impact on any current work is minimal. If imaging HDDs, all seem to have an impact on speed of I/O operations.

    For the least impact, your 1st selection would be best.
     
  20. Stigg

    Stigg Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Posts:
    454
    Location:
    Dededo, Guam
    I have a paid version of Reflect, and I only do Full and Differential backups.
    I don't want or need Incremental backups.
     
  21. oliverjia

    oliverjia Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2005
    Posts:
    1,926
    LOL. Then you actually don't need the paid version. Free version will do all you need just fine.
     
  22. guest

    guest Guest

    Windows built-in one never failed me (for now) even after unbootable systems; interesting than almost no one use it.
     
  23. Brian K

    Brian K Imaging Specialist

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Posts:
    12,146
    Location:
    NSW, Australia
    guest,

    Windows Imaging has a few missing features compared with more modern apps...

    The images aren't compressed and are roughly double the size of images created by other imaging software.

    There is no option for resizing the restored partition.

    You can't restore into a smaller partition (eg if you want to transfer your OS to a SSD).

    The images can't be Validated/Verified.

    You can't move the backup image to another folder as the restore process won't find it.
     
  24. Peter2150

    Peter2150 Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2003
    Posts:
    20,590
    Also the windows imaging is sllllooowww. It takes 45 minutes on my system vs an average of 2-3 minutes for incrementals. And we won't even talk time of restore. For me that time is money.
     
  25. guest

    guest Guest

    yes obviously, my point was not to compare their efficiency/features. Just that it works well (at least for me) and doesn't need discs/usb in case of an unbootable machine.
    Personally i don't transfer backups or do special tasks with them; i use only the core purpose: backup & restore my system on the same hardware.

    Size would be an issue before but now with TB discs not much anymore. Of course, you can say that you need every bit of space you can get; hence, you choose another solution.

    @Peter2150 my System Partition is around 30Gb , take 15mn to do a full image, a bit less to restore. I usually do a backup once, after a clean install with all my priority softs installed.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.