Best av besides mcafee/kaspersky?

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Simon Phoenix, Apr 4, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ianb

    Ianb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2004
    Posts:
    232
    Location:
    UK
    I wouldn't touch that with a barge pole.
     
  2. krak

    krak Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2005
    Posts:
    2
    hi to all.... I just want to say that F-Secure is one of 2 best AV-s in the world... So i recomend to try F-Secure (with engine 5.xx)....
     
  3. Kye-U

    Kye-U Security Expert

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2004
    Posts:
    481
    I feel that F-Secure takes as much RAM as Kaspersky.

    I'm not sure about its detection rate, but I think it comes close to KAV's.

    McAfee is an all-round good AV, but it utilizes ActiveX in its GUI, and that proposes a problem (I disabled ActiveX in my IE settings)

    Norton, system hog, can't remove anything it detects.

    avast!, improving everyday, be sure to keep an eye on this one.

    NOD32, a popular choice, but I've switched from NOD32 to KAV 4.5. (Found some disturbing test scans by a member on DSLReports).

    Dr. Web, seemingly great, but I couldn't get it to run properly on my computer. Whenever I right-click on the Spider icon (In the System Tray), it would take almost one whole minute to display the menu. But I'll be sure to try this AV again when it comes time to format.

    Symantec AV, I feel it's a bit better than McAfee. (Note that this is Symantec AV, not Norton AV.)

    I would pick Dr. Web as an alternative to McAfee/Kaspersky.

    If I would have to pick between McAfee or Kaspersky, I'd pick Kaspersky 4.5.
     
  4. Trooper

    Trooper Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Posts:
    5,507
    NOD32 is the best imho.

    Regards,

    Jag
     
  5. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    Besides Kaspersky/McAfee - I'd say BitDefender or NOD32.

    BD has excellent signatures and an upcoming promising heuristics engine, and NOD already has an excellent heuristic engine, though not as much as BD in the signatures department.
     
  6. bellgamin

    bellgamin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Posts:
    8,102
    Location:
    Hawaii
    Blackspear is, of course, one of the singularly good things about NOD32. However, I do wish he would publish THREE sets of configurations...
    Hyper-paranoid
    Mildly Paranoid
    I feel lucky

    Am I wrong, or are his present settings skewed a tad toward the hyper-paranoid side?
     
  7. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,251
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    I like to set my Anti-Virus "Hardcore Paranoid Schizophrenia" :D
     
  8. BlueZannetti

    BlueZannetti Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Posts:
    6,590
    bellgamin,

    You will be very protected with those settings, they are basically maxed out. I think the general consensus is that the default settings were clearly too much on the "I feel lucky" side. The default settings on the version 2.5 beta are better balanced IMHO, much closer to Blackspears.

    My approach is max settings possible without a performance hit or too many false positives.

    Blue
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.