AV Comparatives Performance Test Available

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Brandonn2010, Dec 9, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Brandonn2010

    Brandonn2010 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Posts:
    1,849
  2. treehouse786

    treehouse786 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2010
    Posts:
    1,388
    Location:
    Lancashire
    thanks for heads up :thumb:
     
  3. Gleipner

    Gleipner Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Posts:
    7
    Location:
    Denmark
    Hi
    And again a super performance from Eset, always so stable.
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2011
  4. ALiasEX

    ALiasEX Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2010
    Posts:
    240
    8 products got a 90 AV-C score. Well done to them and the 4 that got 88.

    Does Webroot SecureAnywhere Antivirus 2012 use the former Prevx technology?
     
  5. Hawk82

    Hawk82 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Posts:
    29
    Yep :)
     
  6. Nevis

    Nevis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Posts:
    786
    Location:
    255.255.255.255
    Results completely as expected .
     
  7. Duradel

    Duradel Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2010
    Posts:
    363
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    F-Secure you've done it again :D
     
  8. vlk

    vlk AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Posts:
    618
    What's the relevance of the results if the score difference between the 1st and 10th place, for example, is just about 1%?

    Who cares about differences that are below statistical error levels?

    The only way I could interpret the results is that pretty much all the products did very well... which may also mean that the tests weren't exercising operations that are typically slowed down by AV software.

    Vlk
     
  9. IBK

    IBK AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2003
    Posts:
    1,819
    Location:
    Innsbruck (Austria)
    thats why they got the same award and explains the footnote #7.
     
  10. darts

    darts Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Posts:
    412
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Vlk,

    You are a devenloper at Avast am i right??
    Are you not happy with the test with Avast?

    Greats,

    darts
     
  11. clocks

    clocks Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2007
    Posts:
    2,559
    If you read his post, he is not unhappy with Avasts result. He is unhappy with the testing methodology.
     
  12. darts

    darts Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Posts:
    412
    Location:
    Netherlands
    I know that but i mean that he is a Avast Developer
     
  13. RejZoR

    RejZoR Registered Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Posts:
    6,426
    Yes, Vlk is working for avast! Software. He's happpy with the result but he's also saying that difference between the best and the worst is very minimal...
     
  14. vlk

    vlk AV Expert

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Posts:
    618
    Not really about the methodology, but rather about the conclusions people typically make when seeing a result table like this. But since the differences are so minimal, I don't think the results of the test really say anything.

    Thanks
    Vlk
     
  15. darts

    darts Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Posts:
    412
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Avast is realy doing great with the preformence but wi'll they also do something about there detection because they are not very great at detection , i hope version 7 of Avast wi'll have a better detection.

    Greats,

    Darts
     
  16. Nightwalker

    Nightwalker Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2008
    Posts:
    784
    F-Secure faster than Panda Cloud and Webroot Security Anywhere? :doubt:
     
  17. darts

    darts Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Posts:
    412
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Yes F-Secure 2012 is very fast they did a great job there.
     
  18. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    4,050
    Location:
    USA
    Pretty much what I was going to post until I saw you beat me to it. These single digit differences are within margin of error even with the same product. The top 12 products on the summary chart would be in a different order if you ran the test again.

    -Also remember these are AV and not suites.
     
  19. PrevxHelp

    PrevxHelp Former Prevx Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Posts:
    8,242
    Location:
    USA/UK
    I agree with vlk's posts above as well. I think the users here have experienced that the bulk of the AV industry isn't within a few percent of each other with regard to overall performance but as these results show, there are some metrics where the spread isn't very wide.

    There are a number of areas to keep in mind with performance - for example, see these results from Maximum PC:

    http://www.maximumpc.com/article/fe...virus_programs_reviewed_and_compared?page=0,4

    File Transfer (6 GB) slowdown (seconds):

    Webroot 0
    McAfee 0
    Avast 0
    Avira 0
    AVG 2
    ESET 3
    Bitdefender 3
    Kaspersky 3
    Norton 5
    Panda 8

    Boot time slowdown (seconds):

    Webroot 0
    ESET 5
    McAfee 5
    Panda 7
    Avast 9
    Avira 9
    Kaspersky 12
    Bitdefender 10
    AVG 16
    Norton 16

    It really depends on which metrics apply to you. An AV could be very light at impacting game performance by staying out of the way of graphics/CPU operations but it might slow down disk access. If you don't play games but you do large amounts of disk operations, you'd possibly want to pick a different AV.

    And if the question is posed to me - yes, I'm a developer at Webroot, and indeed I'm unhappy with the results as our goal (and I think vlk would agree) is to have a 0% system impact, or ideally a negative system impact by removing malware which slows down the system :)

    Thanks to IBK and the rest of AV-C for the testing - while we did score Advanced+, we're working towards a much better result next time!
     
  20. zfactor

    zfactor Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Posts:
    6,012
    Location:
    on my zx10-r
    i agree with vlk and prevxhelp, i OWN webroot, eset, avast, f-secure among many others and personally there is no way f-secure is this light. for those that do agree i apologize but i have tested it on numerous systems with the same results every time. while its FAR from the heaviest thing out there there is no way i would say its lighter than either avast or webroot wsa
     
  21. Nevis

    Nevis Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Posts:
    786
    Location:
    255.255.255.255
    I totally agree. I did not found F-secure light . Infact I even reported an issue and started a topic at wilders too when it got froze and the official support said they are working on that issue .

    it took days for them to solve and as a customer who had other options,I uninstalled it.

    Prime point being, I did not found it very light.
     
  22. Brandonn2010

    Brandonn2010 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Posts:
    1,849
    I think most of it just depends on the machine it's installed on. On mine I've used Avast! and Panda and neither impacted my PC's performance at all.
     
  23. Noob

    Noob Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    Posts:
    6,468
    Thanks for the tests :thumb:
     
  24. dansorin

    dansorin Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2009
    Posts:
    233
    Location:
    EU
    exactly. I'm really surprised to see tests which say f-secure is light. I used f-secure for many years and the computer always felt heavy in operation, also with newer versions. it was bearable/ok, but light? no way!
     
  25. AaLF

    AaLF Registered Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Posts:
    986
    Location:
    Sydney
    Why is Emsisoft Anti-malware not in the tests?
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.