AV-Comparatives Performance Test Apr-2020

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Spartan, May 8, 2020.

  1. imdb

    imdb Registered Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2011
    Posts:
    1,853
    avg, yes, so it has always been. but avast used to be a decent av sw back in the day.
     
  2. Osaban

    Osaban Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Posts:
    5,009
    My experience is with Kaspersky Internet Security and Avira Pro, I have never used free editions. I've used Avira Pro since 2007 and I've never been infected. Unlike other people's opinion, I have no idea if KIS or Avira Pro would totally protect my system from malware in all possible contingencies, I rely on virtualization and imaging programs for 100% security. An AV is just an identifier if malware can be identified, and the only quick way (along with VirusTotal for super paranoids) to check downloads for anomalies. The reason of my choice is the high standards of detection through the years with testing companies like AV Comparatives.

    I also have 8 GB of RAM on 3 Win10 laptops (2 i7 and 1 i5), and even though KIS and Avira are faster than WD, it is hardly noticeable. About 3 years ago from memory WD was definitely heavier, it seems reasonable nowadays.
     
  3. Firecat

    Firecat Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2005
    Posts:
    8,197
    Location:
    The land of no identity :D
    AVG was just fine before the merger. After Avast took over, it took a turn for the worse.
     
  4. ance

    ance formerly: fmon

    Joined:
    May 5, 2013
    Posts:
    1,342
    I really wonder why Kaspersky is always good in performance tests but always fat and slow on my computer. :(
     
  5. Marcelo

    Marcelo Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2005
    Posts:
    209
    Location:
    Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    It probably conflicts with something in your computer either other software you have running or drivers. It would require a lot of testing to discover what and is causing it. It's also known to be slower in older hardware, mainly in computers with low RAM capacity.
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2020
  6. tutman

    tutman Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2019
    Posts:
    16
    Location:
    usa
    What amount of memory do you have? Also might help under scan settings go to the advanced settings tab and under scan optimization change to scan only new and recently changed files after an initial full scan of course.
     
  7. Spartan

    Spartan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Posts:
    670
    Location:
    Dubai
    Same here
     
  8. ance

    ance formerly: fmon

    Joined:
    May 5, 2013
    Posts:
    1,342
    A lot of memory, a fast cpu, ssd harddrive ... I think there must be something wrong with Kaspersky source code. :( Bitdefender and Panda are very light, so I don't need a new computer now. ;)
     
  9. ankupan

    ankupan Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2004
    Posts:
    482
    I agree with these results.

    I have Kaspersky and Avira too. On other PC/Laptops, I installed Avira so I can monitor in my dashboard.

    For my personal Laptop, I have KTS and it is good too.

    Both have almost the same results.

     
  10. xxJackxx

    xxJackxx Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2008
    Posts:
    5,552
    Location:
    USA
    Agreed, we actually used to use AVG. From my understanding since the Avast takeover they are the same code base with a different UI. Correct or not, after the Piriform takeover and the issues there I don't trust any of these products.
     
Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.