Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by Minimalist, Oct 15, 2020.
Shockingly bad performances from Sophos, Cisco, Carbon Black, FireEye and CrowdStrike. I wonder what's up with that.
What interests me are the "deviations from default" test settings. I don't know what to make of this. Not all "deviations" are created equal. And actually, as many enterprises may be targeted, this is actually where the interest should lie primarily.
As for scores, there goes the red stuff in the graphs again, injecting a little marketing bias. All products scored above 90%--it looks like BitDefender, Vipre and ESET aced it. But again, those extra settings away from the products' defaults...one might wonder how much of a role that played for better or worse.
To be honest, I don't really understand what you mean. Seems like all products were tested with most security modules enabled, so at first sight it seems like a fair test to me.
Separate names with a comma.