av-comparatives August 2004

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by blahblah, Aug 28, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. blahblah

    blahblah Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Posts:
    11
    Nod32 don't look so good in the August test at http://www.av-comparatives.org/. It ranked 8th, damn, even weaker than that piece of junk Norton.....i was kinda surprised to see Mcafee to come out on top all teh time.something is fishy :)
     
  2. flyrfan111

    flyrfan111 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,224
    When I looked at the chart detailing what files an AV missed in Feb and what files it misses now of those, NOD only added a 1,000 or so of the 5,000 it missed in Feb. Perhaps Eset feels most of those files NOD missed are junk and do not need to be detected. Just a guess though.
     
  3. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    57,736
    Location:
    Texas
    IBK disagrees with your statement.

    NOD32 is the best in (the important) VirusBulletin Tests, where it has since years always 100% detection of ITW-viruses.
    My tests are done on (not so important) Zoo-samples. No reason to be worry if there is no 100% detection there.


    https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=45853&page=2&pp=30
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.