av-comparatives August 2004

Discussion in 'NOD32 version 2 Forum' started by blahblah, Aug 28, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. blahblah

    blahblah Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Posts:
    11
    Nod32 don't look so good in the August test at http://www.av-comparatives.org/. It ranked 8th, damn, even weaker than that piece of junk Norton.....i was kinda surprised to see Mcafee to come out on top all teh time.something is fishy :)
     
    blahblah, Aug 28, 2004
    #1
  2. flyrfan111

    flyrfan111 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Posts:
    1,229
    When I looked at the chart detailing what files an AV missed in Feb and what files it misses now of those, NOD only added a 1,000 or so of the 5,000 it missed in Feb. Perhaps Eset feels most of those files NOD missed are junk and do not need to be detected. Just a guess though.
     
    flyrfan111, Aug 28, 2004
    #2
  3. ronjor

    ronjor Global Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Posts:
    164,850
    Location:
    Texas
    IBK disagrees with your statement.

    NOD32 is the best in (the important) VirusBulletin Tests, where it has since years always 100% detection of ITW-viruses.
    My tests are done on (not so important) Zoo-samples. No reason to be worry if there is no 100% detection there.


    https://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=45853&page=2&pp=30
     
    ronjor, Aug 28, 2004
    #3
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...