AV-Comparatives: Anti-Phishing Test, August 2015

Discussion in 'other anti-virus software' started by anon, Aug 13, 2015.

  1. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    4,097
  2. Thankful

    Thankful Savings Monitor

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2005
    Posts:
    3,739
    Location:
    New York City
  3. SnowFlakes

    SnowFlakes Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Posts:
    194
    sorry but who gives a ~Snip~ about these antivirus test nowdays :)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 14, 2015
  4. Dwarden

    Dwarden Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2003
    Posts:
    176
    Location:
    Czech Republic
    hmmpf, what happened to the missing antiviruses ? like Avast?
     
  5. anon

    anon Registered Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Posts:
    4,097
  6. Windows_Security

    Windows_Security Registered Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2013
    Posts:
    3,082
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Well,

    Pitty they did not include vanilla browsers as a baseline reference Since URL checking is a numbers game.

    Regards
     
  7. Rolo42

    Rolo42 Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2012
    Posts:
    569
    Location:
    USA
    Well now that wouldn't be good advertising, would it? You're supposed to think you're completely unprotected!

    That's a good question. How can they test Baidu but not Avast or Avira? It's a racket I tellsya. (seriously...Consumer Reports it is not.)
     
  8. Hiltihome

    Hiltihome Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2013
    Posts:
    560
    Location:
    Baden Germany
    Reviews done by AV-Comperatives are a joke, because AV-vendors have the choice to participate in a category, or not...

    "The following ten vendors chose to have their anti-phishing protection publicly tested:"
    http://abload.de/img/av-comp-testxlujm.png
     
Loading...